Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

HE Ano OFTEXAS lion.Andrew P. Johnson Opition Eo. V-1124. County Attorney Dlmmit County Rea Legality of taxing Car~izo Springs, Texas the trial fee as costs in county court when a civil action is dis- Dear Sir: mlssed vith prejudice. We refer to youprecent request which reads in part as follows: "I have received yam letter of jtugust 30th enclosing copies of two opinions con- cerning the propriety of taxing the trial c fee in the County Court when a civil action is dismissed with prejudice upon an agreed settlement. These opinions have been very helpful to me. "We have one case, however, that is not directly disposed of by these opltions. . . . In tMs case the original petition was filed and citation issued. The return on the cfta- tlon shows that Itwas served on March 9, 1950, and it was filed on mlarch10, 1950. Ho answer was filed, but on J.uue5, 1950, the court en- tered an order of dismissal, ' with full pre-. judice as against plaintiff,' and 'with full prejudice.* A certified copy of this order is enclosed herewith. '1 would appreciate it very much if you would advise me, by opinion OP otherwise, whether OP not the trial fee should be taxed as a cost in tbia case." The judgment referred to is as follows: "This the 5 day of June, 1950, the de- fendants having not as yet answered, came the ., 1. Att'y Gen. Ops. O-1144 (1939) and O-4532 (1942). Hon. Andrew P. Johnson,,page 2 (V-1124) plaintiff by his attorneys, and in open court.announcedto the court that all mat- ters in controversyhad been settled and disposed of by agreement of the parties, and plaintiff'sattorney requested the court to enter an order of dismissal with full prejudice, and the court being of the opinion that such order should therefore be ,entered; "It is therefore considered,adjudged and ordered by the court that this cause be, and it is hereby dismissed with full prejudice as against plaintiff; and it ap- pearing to the court that all costs have been paid therefore let no execution ls- sue." Article 3926, V.C.S., provides in part; #The county judge shall also receive the following fees: +l . . . ‘2. . . . For each civil cause finally disposed of b him by trial or otherwise, Five Dollars s$5), to be taxed against the pkrty cast in the suit; . . ." The rule is stated in Corpus Juris Secundum (Vol. 50, p. 61-62): 'A voluntary discontinuanceof a cause by plaintiff, OP the dismissal of the action on his motion, does not as a rule amount to a judgment on the merits and thereforewill not bar a new action on the same subject mat- ter, especially if expressed to be without prejudice; . . . "A different situation exists, however, where it affirmativelyappears that plaln- tiff Intended to abandon the action, in which case it Is treated as a retraxit.~So plain- tiff's dismissal of a suit with prejudice is as conclusive of the rights of the parties as an adverse judgment after trial, being res -. judicata of all questions which might have been litigated in the suit; and an entry on Hon. Andrew P. Johnson, page 3 (V-1124) the record that the debt has been paid and the suit ended Is 8 bap’to another action on the same debt." (Emphasisadded.) Also in Cass County v. Rambo, 131 S.W.2d 214, 216 (Tex. Civ.App. 1939, affirmed STex. 476, 143 S.W.2d 916), it is stated2 ‘It appears to be settled that when a’jk&ent is based upon an agreement of the parties, It is as conclusive of all matters covered by the agreement as a judg- ment on the merits would be,' . . . 'that a judgment of dismissal entered by agreement of the parties In pursuance of a comprcrmise, OP settlement of the controversy,becomes a judgment on the merits and bars another ac- tion for the same cause.1n In view of the foregoing, it is our opinion that the case has finally been disposed of and the trial fee of five dollars should be taxed as costs under the facts submitted. Where a oivil suit is dismissed with gtrejudtce in oounty court by agreement of the parties, it Is finally disposed of, and the trial fee of $5.00 should be taxed as costs. Art. 3926, V.C.S,; 50 C.J.S. APPROVED% Yours very truly, 3. C. Dsvis, Jr. PRICE WIfIEL County Affairs Mvlsion Attorney Cieneral Everett I3stckinson Executive Assistant Charles D, Mathews Pimt Assistant BJ-@ii%h Assistant BA:mw