Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

January 28, 1949 Hon. ‘Robert~S. Calvert Comptroller of Public Accoun+' Austin,.Texas Opinion No. V-762 . Be: Eligibility of a County which comes within subsection 15(a) of IArticle 39X%; in Janpary, 1949 to partici- patiein the appropriation.containea in'Ifemll;,H.B. 244, for the re- mainder of the current .biennium. mar&: :xou+:+q~~st.'for.an opinioni in part* reads: .." -.qAt.ibe.‘gxeEient,t~there tie six co& t$e%in-$hi@~&ate~under 20,000 in population whiob-.haM :ae' CoirntyAttorney performing th8 ;auty-~f!a:;Dis~riot.Attorriey ena the ctipensa- t$on ti all of the~.oount$ofYicWs in these counties .ls:tKeirrees of office. _. f. "This aepartment has beQn placed'on no- tice by the officials of,one of these counties ,-th&-the..c.+&y officers would. be compensated .on.~:'~l~~,-basi~-',~ginnisg'Jannary‘1;:1949.: This oounty will~be eligible.ior the apportion- meqt under.th& provis~ionsof &t&cle 39&2e, Sec- tion .15,.Sub&e&ian (-a)p&e 286 of Vernon's CivQ St?tuF;es+ . ~'~Whouldthis departm&it'm&ke this appor- ti'onGn%-,?rom.theemoutltappropri,ateil by-House. Bill~Nudber W+;:Chapter 338, Se&ion 11;$146,-, 429,~page.645,:, General and Speci+Laws of the 50th.Legislature,,for'the period January 1, 1949 to August Zl.,1949,'inclusiv~? Or. should this department make.the apportionment,by a,%ransfer from.the appropriation in Seotion 9, $60,000,~0f the above bill to the apportionment appropria- tion for this apportionment in Section 11, if so, would the amount transferred be the maximum amount due such couhty, or would the fact that Hon. Robert S. Calvert - Page 2 (V-762) the counties now eligible for the apportion- ment from the $146,429 receive only 56% of the maximum amount due them have to be con- sidered in making this transfer? Or would it be necessary for a supplemental appropria- tion to be made before this apportionment could be accomplished? With reSard to ~theabove questions ref- erence is made to your opinion Number O-6652, . questions Numbers 1 and 4 and the answers thereto." Section 6(a) of Article 39lZ.e,V.C.S., in part, reads: n . . .~It shall be the duty of the Comptrol- ler of Public Accounts to annually apportion to .a11 counties in which the county officers are to be compensated on the basis of a sal- erg any monies, appropriated for said year for such'apportionment; each county entitled to ~participatein ,such apportionment shall receive'..for.the-benefitof its:.Offic'ers' Sal- :ary.Fund,.or funds its proportionate part of' the apjYopriation which shall be 'distributed. among then several'counties entitled to Darti; qipate therein on the basis 'ofthe'.percapita opulation of each county, according~to the st'precedinp Federal Census. . ." (Empha- .~.sis added).. .' .Sec.tion15 of Article 39128 V;C.S..,in part, and &bsec,tion..(ti)thereof respectiveiy read as follows: .,., !'The.Commissioners'Court in counties ,havinga..populationof less then twenty (20,- OOO)inhabitants.,according'to the last pre- ceding Federal Census eat the first regular ~meetiag ,inJanuary of:each calendar year, may pass an order .providing for compensation of all'county andiprecinct officers on a salary, .basis. The Commissioners1 Court in each.of such counties.1~ hereby authorized, and it shall be its duty, to fix the salaries of Criminal District Attorneys. In'the event such Court passes such'order they Shall pay to each of said District and County officers in money an annual salary in twelve (12) Hon. Robert S. Calvert - Page 3 (V-762) .. equal installments of not less than the total sum earned as compensation by said officer in his said official capacity for the fiscal year of 1935,and not more'then the maximum allowed such officer under laws existing August.24th, 1935. . ." (a). The oompensation of,a Criminal Distriot Attorney, or County Attorney who performs the duties of Mstrict Attorneys, together with the compensation of his as- sistants, shall be paid out of the-County Officers' Salary Fund, but the State shall pay into such,.fund'eachyear an amount equal to a sum which bears the same propor- ticinto the total salary of such Criminal District Attorney, or County Attorney per& forming the duties of a District Attorney, together with the salary of his assistants, as all felony fees collected by such offi- cial auring the year or 1935 bear to the total fees collected by such official dur- ix@ ~such year;"' _ '_ . The~provisions of subsection (a); supra, are also contained inysubsection (b).,.section13, of Article 39128, v;c.s., whioh.is applicable to allthose countias h&ring a population of 20,000 or more and lessthen 190,- 000 &Cording to the last preceding Federal Census. The county officers of all such aounties,&e compensated on a salary;basisr (Sec. 61, Art. XVI, Con&.), Items 9, lO.and ll of the'appropriations made to the Comptroller%-Department for the current fiscal year (Acts 50th Leg ., Ii.3. 244, pd 645) respectively read as r0ilavs: "9. .Fees ana costs or sheriffs, at- torneys ;ana clerks in felony cases; ana fees of oounty jtiages, county attorneys, .justicesof peace,sheriffs and oonstables in exemining trials where indict- ments are returnad. $ 60,OOO.OO Hon. Robert S. Calvert - Page 4 (V-762) "10. Apportionment to counties where county officers are paid salaries (per Chapter 465, Section 6A, Second Called Session, Acts Forty- fourth Legislature). Should,any county, by electipn of the Com- missioners Court, change from salary to fee basis or vice versa, the Comptroller shall make adjust- ment in the appropriations by transferring the correot amount from appropriation made for fees and costs of sheriff and other county officials to appropriation to pay counties on a per capita basis or vice versa as the case may be 514,ooo.oo nil. Apportionment to counties where county officers are paid. salaries end where there is a criminal dis- triotattorney or county,attorney performing the.duties.of.district attorney (As per sub-section B, Section 13,and Section.15, sub7 sectionA, Chapter 465, Acts Forty-fourth'Le&slature) 146,429.OO" .Item 9 is primarily en appropriation to pay the OffiC8TS named therein.-ofcounties in which all county officers ar.ecompensated on a~fee basis for par- ticular services rendered the State asprovided by the statutes. Item'10 is an appropriation for the benefit of c3.lcounties wherein all county officers are compen- satid on a salary basis. It.was made by the Legislature in obedience to the provisions of -Section 6(a) of Arti- cle 3912e. However, since the Commissioners~ Court of any county having 'apopulation of less than 20,000 has been authorized by Section 15 to d-mine at its first ~regularmeeting in January of each calendar yearwhether all county officers shall be for that year ccmpensated on a fee or salary basis, the Legislature has provided in Item10 for the Comptroller to transfer from Item 9 to Item 10 or vice versa in the event such changes are made. Section 6(a) requires this appropriation to be apportioned among the counties entitled to participate therein "on the basis of the per capita population of each county accordiny,to the last preceding Federal Cen- sus." Hon. Robert S. Calvert - Page 5 (V-762) The appropriation made by Item 11 is to pay all those counties~which come within the classifications described in subsection (b) of Section 13 and subsection (a) of Section 15, and must be apportioned by the Comp- troller to each county in accordance with the formula prescribed therein. In other words, any county, regard- less of its population, is eligible to.participate in the distribution of this appropriation, provided its county officers are compensated on a salary basis and which has a criminal district attorney or a county attor- ney performing the duties of a district attorney. The purpose of this appropriation is wholly unrelated to the purposes of the appropriations contained in Items 9 and 10. The authority'conferred upon the Comptroller to make adjustment in these two appropriations cannot be. extended by construction to include the appropriation in Item 11. We have examined all appropriations heretofore. made by the Legislature for distribution to counties in accordance with the provisions of Section 6(a) and sub- section (b), Seation 15, of Article 3%.2e, and have found ~, that each appropriation'maae prior to the appropriation made by the 50th Legislature limited the number of coun- ties eligible to participate in each such appropriation to thirty-three. The current appropriation (Item 11) is note so limited. You have informed us that the 50th Legislature discovered that there were six additional counties hav- ing a population of less than 20,000 inhabitants accord- ing to the last census in which the county officers were compensated on a fee basis and haviw either a criminal district attorney or a county attorney performing the du- ties of.a district attorney. Therefore, it appears the Legislature realized the probability of one or more of these counties becoming eligible during the current bien- nium to participate in the distribution of this appropria- tion and for that reason,did not limit the appropriation to any number of counties, thereby enabling such county or counties to participate therein. In view of the foregoing,.it is our opinion that when a county of less than 20.,000 inhabitants in which the county officers have heretofore been compensated on a fee basis and which has a criminal district attorney or a coun- ty attorney performing the duties of a district attorney, chawes its method of compensating its county officers Hon. Robert S; C&i&t .-‘.Page 6 .iV;76?) ‘is’ &tltI* tb. receLve Its prp~ort&nats~pert a~r&.iriatloii’~ln mxim 11. (&ate ~5oai .Lisg., Hif ‘. .. ... _. : ... ., 1’~‘I~ .‘, : ‘.