Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

THE ATTOKNEY GENERAL OPTEXA~ October 5@ 1948 Hon. C, H. Cavness State Auditor Austin, Texas Attention: Mr. William A. Harrison Opinion No. V-696 Re: Effective dates of clem- ency proclamations and the legality of payment of discharge funds 5 years after a condition- al pardon is granted, Dear Sir:- In your letter of reoent date you request an opinion by this department upon the following questions: "Under Section 10 of Article 6203, Vernon's R, C, S., the Texas Prison Sys- tern is required to pay $i5aO0 to each pa- rolee who receives a Conditional Pardon, "In checking the records of the Texas Prison System we find that during the oal- endar year 1948 the Prison System has made payments to parolees who received Condi- tional Pardons back in the year 1943* Is this procedure legal in view of our two- year Statute of Limitation? "In our examination of Clemency Proc- lamations signed by the Governor, we find that the Texas Prison System is following the practice of starting Clemency on the date the convict is released from Prison, in view of the fact that specified dates are not shown in the Clemency Proclame- tions, "This procedure has caused confusion as no one seems to know whether such . . Hon. C. H. Cavness - Page 2 (V-696) Clemency should become effective as of the date of the Proclamation or as of the date the prisoner is released from Prison. Xi11 you please advise whet procedure should be followed?” Section 10 of Article 6203 of Vernon’s Civil Statutes is as follows: YJpon the discharge of any prisoner upon parole, either under the provisions of this Act, or through the exercise by the Governor of executive clemency, independent of this Act, such person so paroled, shall be furnished by the proper officers of the State Prison Board with such clothing as is usually furnished to prisoners upon dis- charge from prison in this State together with a railroad non-transferable ticket from the place of his discharge to the place of his conviction and sentence, and in addi- tion thereto the sum of $5.00,” The current appropriation for the Texas Pris- on System contains the following rider: “Discharged convicts revolving fund, Twenty-five Thousand ($25,000.00) Dollars is continued and reappropriated until Sep- tember 1, 1949, to be deposited equally in the First National Bank 01 Huntsville and the Huntsville National Bank, and each of said Banks shall deposit with the General Manager of the Prison System, bonds or se- curity to be approved by the Prison Board and the Attorney General of the State of Texas to secure said deposit, and this ep- propriation is made under and by virtue of the law of the Acts of the First Called Ses- sion of the 43rd Legislature, page 228, Chapter 104, and it is the intent of the Legislature to carry this Act out in full as provided for in Chapter 104, Acts of the First Called Session of the 43rd Legisla- ture, and all discharged, paroled, or par- doned convicts shall be paid out of this fund from moneys earned from any source of the Prison System and deposited to this C. H. Cavness - Page 3 (V-696) fund under the provisions of said Chapter 104 of the Acts of the First Called Ses- sion of the 43rd Legislature,” The Prison iievolving Fund thus appropriated is a part of the State monies, and the appropriation there made is a part of the biennial appropriation and as such expires at the end of the biennium, Answering your questions in the order in which they are above repeated, we beg to advise: It is the opinion of this office that biennial appropriations are meant to cover items and claims for the current period for which the appropriations are made, and may not be used for purposes such as you mention of paying claims arising prior to such appropriations. Undoubtedly, an appropriation could be made to pay an existing liability antedating the Act if the lan- guage used clearly evIdencea SW& iltentlm, but no such intention appears in the rider quoted, Your first ques- tion, therefore, is answered in the negative., An executive clemency is the Act of the Governor evidenced by his .proclamation. The legal effeot of the proclamation is.to tender to the ooavict the clemency therein drfined, and in the terms and upon the conditions therein stated, Any clemency (especially one involving conditions) must be accepted by the convict before it be- comes effective, Ex parte Frazier, 239 S, W, 972; Ex parts Davenport, 7 S- WD (2d) 589, For computing the time of the clemency, therefore, the period begins when the proclamation io made known to thr Brirol Hanagor, the prisoner haa accepted thm same and has bmon lotuallj IO- leased thereunder 0 The lpBrowiatio& of the ourrtit bismium to the Texap Prirr &Lqak@ for paying $5.00 to a convict reoeiving a oallitioral par&n rry amt be use& to pay these conviots whcse coali- tional pardons were issuea prior to the Apprr- priation Act. A olemenoy to a convict released from prison is computed, as to time, rru ths (Iay - - Hon. C. H. Cavness - Page 4 (v-696) such convict is released from the Prison. Yours very truly, ATTOIXN~YGBNERALOF TiXAS BY a& Ocie Speer 0S:wb Assistant ATTO.RNEYGENERAL