Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

August 6, 1948 Hon. Jean Day Opinion Noo.V-655 County Attorney Henderson County Re: Allowance to a sheriff of Athens, Texas 15~~per day for safe-keep of prisoners. Dear Sir: We refer to your letter in which you submit the following: "The Sheriff of Henderson County has filed a sworn account with the Commission- ers' Court of Henderson County under the ,~ above Section of the Statute aridrequested that-he be paid ,thesum of 15# per day for the safe-keep of each of the prisonerswho have been in his custody for the past three months. The Commissioners'Court of Hender- son County has refused to pay the Sheriff's account for the reason as stated by them that they are paying the salary of a full- time jailer, who is in charge of the Hen- derson County Jail and the prisonerskept therein. "Under the facts stated above is the CommissionersfCourt of.Hendersoneounty justified in refusing the payment of the Sheriff's account for the safe-keep of pris- oners as provided under Section 1 of said Article 104C?" Section 61, Article XVI of the State Consti- tution reads in part: "All district officers in the State of Texas and all county officers in coun- ties havine a uouulation of 20.000 or morg accordins to the then last urecedinp Fed- ' era1 Census. shal& from the first day of Ron. Jean Day - ?age 2 (V- 655) January and thereafter,and subsequentto the first Regular or Special Session of the Legislatureafter the adoption of this Res- olutionO be cansersatedon a salav bas&*" .(Enphasisadded) Henderson County has a population of 31,822, and, therefore,compensates its officers on a salary basis, Section 13 of Article 3912e of Vernon's Civil Statutes reads in part: "The CommissionerstCourt in counties having a population lf twenty thousand (20,- 000) inhabitantsor more, and less than one hundred and ninety thousand (190,.000)inhab- itants according to the last preceding Fed- eral Census, is hereby authorized and it shall be its duty to fix the salaries of all the following named officers, to-wit: sheriff, assessor and collector of taxes, county judge, county attorney, including criminal district attorneys and county attorneyswho perform the duties of district attorneys, district clerk, county clerk, treasurer,hide and ani- mal inspector. Each of said officers shall be aid in money an annual salary in twelve (L2p equal installmentsof not less than the total sum earned as compensationby-him in his official capacity for the fiscal year 1935, and not more than the maximum amount al- lowed such officer under laws existing on Aug-, ust 24, 19350 9 I..,I0 Section 1 of said Article reads: "No district officer sLl1 be paid by the State of Texas any fees or commission for any service performed by him; nor shall the, State or any county pay to any county officer in any county containing a populationof twen- ty thousand (20,000) Inhabitantsor more ac- cording to the last precedingFederal Census any fee or commission for any service by him performed as such officer; provided, however, that the assessor and collector of taxes shall continue to collect and retain for the Hon. Jean Day - page 3 (V-655) benefit of the officers' Salary Fund or, funds hereinafter provided for, all fees and commissionswhich he is authorized under law to collect; and it shall be his duty to account for and to pay all such monies received by him into the fund or funds created and provided for under the provisions of this Act; provided further, that the provisions of this Section shall not affect the payment of costs in civil cases by the State, but all such costs so Paid,shall be accounted for by the offi- cers collecting the same, as they are re- quired under the provisions of this Act to account for fees, commissions and costs collected from private parties." Section 22 readsr "The provisions of this Act shall be cumulative of all laws not in conflict herewith: It is hereby declared to be the intention of the Legislature that the com- pensation, limitationsand maxirums fixed in this Act for the named officers, their deputies, assistants and employees control over any other Provisions contained in all law, general and special." In Nueces County v. Currington, 139 Tex. 297, 162 S. W. (26) 687, the Supreme Court copied pertinent parts of Articles 38839 3891, 3912e and other appropri- ate laws in Vernon's Civil Statutes, and construed same in connectionwith Section 61 of Article XVI of the State Constitution,as follows: ‘1s 0 0 The compensation,~limitationsand maximums herein fixed shall also apply to all fees and compensationwhatsoever col- lected by'said officers in their official capacity,whether accountableas fees of office under the present law, (or not) and any law, general or sPrcia1, to the con- trary is hereby expressly repealed. The only kind and character of compensationex- empt from the provisions of this Act shall be rewards received by Sheriffs * * *.Pur- suant to the constitutionalmandate Hon. Jean Day - Page 4 (V-655) the legislaturepassed and approved (No- vember 15, 1935) a comprehensiveact pre- scribing in the manner therein stated the compensationof district, count and pre- cinct officers. ‘secti 1 rt8 &h leg,,, 2nd C. S., ch. 465 p0 17 2 now sec. 1, art. 3912e, Vernon:s Ann. Clr. St. The act carries by recitation (set, 24) the legislative interpretationthat the amend- ment made fit mandatory that constitution-. al countv officers in counties ha ins a ponulation of tweatv thousand (2OTCCOl inhabitantsor mora, l + * be c msensated solelv en a sal v ba I * * * TItalics ours)." (Under~~oredsw%ds are in ital- its by the Court) In view of the foregoingwe are of the opinion that the provisions of Section 1, Article 3912e, V.C.S., prohibit the Commissioners* Court of a salary county from paying the sheriff the 15# per day for the safe-keep of each prisoner as provided in Article 10&O, V.C.C.P. Ar- ticle 1040 was passed in 1923 when all the county offi- cers in this State were compensatedon a fee basis. In- 1935 the voters of this State adopted Article XVI, Sec- tion 61 of the Texas Constitutionwhich made it mandatory that all the county officers in counties having a popula- tion of 20,000 or more according to the last preceding Federal Census be compensatedon a salary basis beginning January 1, 1936, and subsequentto the adoption of this constitutionalamendment the,Legislatureenacted Section 1 of Article 3912e, which supersededthe provisions of Subdivision1, Article 1040, V. C. C. ,P.relative to coun- ty officers compensatedon a,salary basis. SUMMARY The provisionsof Section 1, Article 3912e, V. C. S. prohibit the Commissioners' Court of a salary county from paying the sheriff 15# per day for the safekeep of each' prisoner. Very truly yours~, APPROVID: , ATTORNRYGENWAL OFTEXAS BY EY GENERAL Assistant WTW :wb