Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

AUSTIN 11. TEXAS PRICE DANIEL ATTORNEYGENERAL May 14, 194% Hon. Odis Tomachefsky Opinion Ro. V-579 County Attorney Washington County Re: Authority of Commission- Brenham, Texas ers’ Court to ‘pay for a rock crusher with time warrants to be paid by tax for permanent im- provement 9 (1 Dear Sir: We refer to your letter of April 22, 1948, in which you ask if Washington County may issue time war- rants to be paid by a tax levied for permanent improve- ments, to pay for a rock crusher for use in preparing materials for the construction of roads in said county. In the case of Carroll v. Williams, 109 Tex. 155, 202 S. W. 504, the Supreme Court of Texas said: ‘*Moreover, in this instance the attemp%- ed transfer of money was not from a fund raised for ‘streets * * * and other permanent improvements,’ but was from the general fund for ‘county purposes,’ which is an entirely distinct and different fund, and which, as we have attempted to show, cannot be applied, lawfully, on reads and bridges. “Taxes levied ostensibly for any specific purpose or class of purposes designated in section 9 ef article 8, supra, must be applied thereunto, in good faith; and in no event and under no circumstances may there be expended, legally, for one such purpose or class of pur- poses, tax money in excess of the amount raised by taxation declaredly for that particular pur- pose or class of purposes. But this rule would not prevent the proper expenditure, for such purpose or purposes, of any unexpended balance in the corresponding fund brought over from any previous year or years.” Hon, Odis Tomachefsky - Page 2 w- 579) Applying the principles announced in this case to the situation about which you inquire, tax money rais- ed for the purchase of road equipment (rock crusher) must come from the road and bridge fund and not the permanent improvement fund. Therefore the Commissioners' Court is without authority to issue time warrants against the perma- nent improvement fund for the purpose of purchasing a rock crusher, because this would constitute an unlawful transfer and diversion of constitutional funds. The Commissioners* Court is not authorized to issue time warrants, to be paid by a tax for permanent improvements, for the purchase of a rock crushing machine for use in preparing ma- terial to be used in the construction of public roads. Yours very truly, ATTORNEY GEiWPA~OFTEXAS BY 49 WTWrwb Assistant APPROVED: