Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

H-Z;? , * Honorable J. G. Lyles Opinion No. V-22 Caunty Attorney Robertson County ae: Authority of a deputy Franklin, Texas game and fish warden to enter uponinclossd land *here wild game is known to ran e or stray for any o% the purposes enumerated in Article 919, Penal Code, without a search warrant and over the protest of the owner thereof. Dear Sir: This is in reply to your letter dated No- vember 22, 1946, wherein you request the opinion of this departmentrelative to the following question, and we quote: “A, the owner and lessor of inclosed lands, has leased his lands to other par- ties for huntin purposes, and has complied with Article 902 Penal Code. A refuees permission to G&e Warden to search his leased premises. “Question: Does Game Warden have le- gal authority to enter AIs premlusr Over his protest without having obtained a le- gal search warrant?” Article’I,Section 9, Texae Constitution, provides: “The people shall be secure~in their persons,,houses, papws and possessfans, from all unreasonableseisures or searches, and no warrant to search any place, or to soiae any pereon or thing,~shall issut . Hon. ~J.G, Lyles - Page 2 witnout describingthem as near as ma;{be, nor witnout probable cause supported by oatn or affirmation." The Fourth Amendment to the Canatitvtionof the United States reads as follows: "The right of tne La tc he ,se- :;;:,t: t&gF$&a :,,$gg; z;; seiw&, shall not b6 vie&wed,, but nc warrants shall is6ue, but up4n r&able came, supportedby qath or aff!.rmation, and particularlydescribing; the piace to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." Articles 871, 871a, 905, 906, 914 919 Penal Code of 1925, Sections 3~aad 6 of Article 478f, Vernon's Annotated Penal Code, and Article 4026, Re- vised Statutes, read respectively,in whole or in part as follows: "Article (371. 'CoauPissioner'.The word 'commissioner'wherever used in this chapter, shall be held to mean the Game, Fish and Oyster Commissionerof the State of T6ras.w "Article 871a. Wild bird6 and ani- mals* All wild an$lnaLs. w5.l.d birds and wild fowl uithin t&e ,%+$$a@&&f ahi. $ulate are herakay deo&+ed &Q Ihya #k4 pp+srty ef the peeglr af t5hSeYtwe!." "Art;icle99g. 4%3pMwa**r to mn- force game law, The.&?a~, F‘Mh aml Dys!tier Commissienerand hia deputies skakl have the same power and aut@rSty a6 I#h6rffls to serve criminal proeeiq,rsin connection with ~6~6~6@owing out .arfBe YPllaQdons of this chapter, shall have the s'amep4w- er as shariff6 ts requj;re6i6 rLnrxecut- ing suoh process, and shal.1he emtltlad to receive the same fe6s as are pL*avldedby law for sheriffs in mlsdeatesnarcases. "Said Commissioner'orany of his deputies may ameat w!itheuCa warrant,any Hon. J. G. Lyles - Page 3 person found by them in the,act of violat- ing any of the laws for the protectionand propagationof game, wild birds or fish, and take such person forthwith before a magistrate having jurisdiction. Such ar- rests may be made on Sunday, and in which case the person arrested shall be taken before a magistrate having jurisdiction, and proceeded against as soon as may be, on a week day following the arrest." "Article 906, Deputy Commissioners to enforce law. It is hereby made a spe- cial duty of the Game, Fish and Oyster Commissionerto enforce the statutes of this-State for the proteotion'and preserve- tion of wild game and wild birds; and to bring;,or cause to be brought, actions and proceedingsin the name of the State of Texas, to recover any Lnd all fines and penalties provided for in the laws now in nforce, or which may hereafter be enacted, 'relating tdwild game and wild birds., Said Game, Fish ,andOyster Cemmirsionermay make complaint and cause proceedingsto be cem- menced against any person~forviolating any of the'lairsfor the protectionand propaga: tion of gama~or birda without the sanctien of the County attorney of thb county in which such proceedingsare comnenced;and in such casoa he shall not be required-to furnish security for costs@* %rticle 914. Special.deputygame Commissioners. It shall.be the duty of the ~Gama,3iah and Gyster Commissionerto appoint special deputy game commisSWn~s, who shall be ox officio deputy game:,fieh and oystrr commiaeionersto *n$orae Con* servation laws in the various districts oft the State ,withall the powers of the lat- ter to enhorce the game fish and.oyster 1anS of this State, 9:*'en wArticle~919~'-Powerof commi,ssianets to enter 'onlsmids. The Game, Fisk atid Oge+~ Cop1s;sssiia&apu hLf4&p3iy2~s,shall at all~timee have.the powertd eWer upon any wda or waterwhere wild gaW"or fish Hon. J. G. Lyles - Page 4 are known to range or stray for the purpose of enforcing the game, and fish laws of thi8 State, and for the purpose of asking scientific invest1 ations or for research work as to such WI d eme or fish, and no %a8 11 be sustained action in any court against the commissioneror any of his deputies to prevent their entrance upon lands or waters when .actingintheir of- ficial capacity as herein set f0rth.e 'Article 978f. Game, Fish, and Oys- ter CollPiseion;powers and duties& Sec. 1. The offiae of Game, Fish and Oyster Com- missioner of the State ef Texas is hereby abeli8hed. There is hereb created the Geme Fish and Oyster Cm Ission which ahall bare the authority, powers, d&tee and fuastione heretoforevested 1n the Game, Fish md Oyrter Ce-lieaiener,ex- cept where in conflictwith We AetP *Seation 6* Said Game, Fish and Oyster Cemmissionshall have power and authority to appoint ansxeuutive eee- retary who ahall act as the chief execu- tlve officer under the direation of said Game, Fish and Oyster Commission. The Commissionmay perform its duties through said executive secretary and may dele ate to him suah executive dutiee as said Le, Fish aad Oyster Commissionshall deem proper. They shall also have power and authority to appoint an assistant execu- tive searetarywho, in the absence of the exeoutivesecretary, shall perform aa the Butlea of the executive secretary and shall perform such other dutiee as may be preecribedby the Game, Fish and Gyster Cos~iesiemor under its &#uotion. Said executive eeoretary shall have authority to appoint suah head6 of divisions and such Game and Fieh wardens and other em- ployees as in his diaaretienmay be deemed neaeesary to carry out and enforce the lava of this State, which it is the duty of eaid Game, Fish and Oyster Commission to carry out exeaute and administer,and to perform a i1 other duties and services Hon. J. G. Lyles - Page 5 authorized and required to be performed by said Game, Fish and Oyster,Cozznission,and shall have the authority, powers, duties and functions heretofore vested'in Special Deputy Game, Fish and Oyster Commissioners and other employees of the ~Game,Fish and Oyster Commissioner.* * *" "Article 4026. Property of State. All fish and other aquatic animal life con- tained in the fresh water rivers, creeks and'streamsand in lakes or sloughs sub- ject to overflow from rivers or other streams within the:bordersof +,hisState are hereby declared to be property of the people~of this State, All of the public rivers, bayous, lagoons, creeks, lakes, bays and inlets in this State, and all that part of the Gulf of Mexico within the jurisdictionof t&As State, toget,her with their beds and bottoms, and all of the products ther.eof,shall continue and remain the property of the State of Texas, except in so far as the State shall permit the use of said waters and bottoms, or permit the taking of the products of such bottoms and waters, and in so far as this use shall relate to or affect the.taking and conservationof fish, oysters, shrimp, crabs, turtle, terrapin,mussels, lob- sters, and all other kinds and forms of marine life, or relate to sand, gravel, merl mud shell and all other kinds of aheli, the,Game, Fish and Oyster Commis- sioner shall have jurisdictionover and control of, in accordancewith and by the authority vested in him by the laws of this Stste." We have quoted the Constitutionalprovisions of both the State and Federal Constitutionsand some of our statutes which are pertinent to your question in which you have used the word upremisesW. In this connection,we direct your attention to the pr,ovisions of Article 919, the statute which by it6 terms em- powers deputy game and fish wardens at all times to enter upon lands or water where wild game or fish are known to range or stray for the purpose of enforcing the game; and fish laws of thisstate, and for the Hon. J. G. Lyles a Page.6 purpose of making scientificinvesti ationgTg ;z;dre- search work as to such wild game or fish. “premises”,as used in your question,might be con- strued to include the private residence of the owner, or of his tenant residing thereon, and those things connected therewith, such as gardens, outhouses,and appurtenancesnecessary for the domestic comfort of the dwelling house, which ordinarilymay not be searched without a search warraqt,or permissionof the occupant thereof. It is our opinion that this statute does not attempt to give the ,officersnamed any such authority, for the statute only empower8 these officers “to enter upon any 1anUs or water where wild game or fish are known to range or strays. Wild game and fish do not range or atray into pri- vate residences,places of businese or the appurte- nances thereto. Our answer will be “mited to the author- ity of deputy game and fisn wardens ‘to enter upon any lands or water where wild game or fish are known to range or stray” for any one or more of the pur- posea enumeratedin Article 919, Penal Code, without a search warrant and over the protect of the owner of the land. The State of Texas owna in trust for the eo le of the State all the wild anImala and wild girii s, including wild fowl, within ite bordere. It also owns for the same purpose all fish and aquatic life in the fresh water rivers, creeks, streams and lakes, or sloughs subject to overflow from rivers or otner streams within the bounds of the State, in- cluding all of the Gulf of Mexico its bays and in- lets so situated. Articles 871, benal Code, and 4026, Revised Civil Statutes; Goldsmith and Powell V. State, 159 S. W. (2d) 534 wrror refused; ;;eyenson v. Wood, 119 Tex. $63, 34 S. W, (2d) 246, a. 6,s(2d) 794. In view of the fore oing Statements, it necessarily follows that the 8t&e, acting under its police power, has the undoubted authorityto regulate the taking of’its wild animals, wild birds, fish, and other aquatic life, and to enact laws for the propa- gation, protection,and preservationtbereof, includ- ing the making of scientificinvestigation6and re- search work. For all of these purposes, the State has passed many general laws, both civil and criml- Hon. JI G. Lyles,- Page 7, nal, includingthose cited herein, and for the en- forcement thereof has created the Game, Fish and Oys- ter Commission,the Office of Executive Secretary, Assistant Executive Secretary, Deputy Game and Fish Wardens and presaribedtheir powers and duties. These deputy wardens in the execution of the duties imposed upon them by statute exercise the power and ' authority,given to sheriffs by the laws of this State, and may arrest without a warrant any person found by them in the act of violating any of the laws for the protection and propa ation of ga-.le birds or fish. (Article9057 ,Theyalso &v!%l the power conferred upon them by Article 919, and other statutes. Neither the Constitutionand statutes of this State nor the Constitutionof the United States prohibits every search or seizure without a warrant, but only.unreasonablesearches and selaures. Moore v. Adams 91 S. U. (2d) 24'4;Jaakson v. State, 295 S. W. 614; Hughes vs. 9 Si,W. 173 184. Crowell vs. State 180 S. W. 2d) 344; United States VS. Rogato, 39 F 12d 171, 172, and authorities cited therein; The A.,ourtsof this State, the Supreme Court of the United States, and other Federal Court8 have held that searches of open fields or that which is-open to view withou,ta search warrant, are not prohibited by the Constitutionof either the State or Federal Government. Wolf v. State 9 Se W. (2d) 350; McTyre v. State 19 S. W. (2d) 44; Crewel1 V'S State 180 S. W. (2d) 34%; Robie v* State, 36 Si We (2d) i75; Hester v.‘United~Statea,265 U. S. 57; United States v. Rogato su e;,United States va McBride, 287 F. 214, 28&F 4lf;;, 261 U. SI 614. In the case of Wolf v+ State, supra, the Gourt svam "It is apparent from the precedents that the immunity from interferenceis founded upon the desire to give effect to the idea that 'a manvs.homs,iehis castle',; that an unreasonablesearch is one ,which trenches upon the peaceful enjoyment of the house in which he dwells or in which he works and does business, and those things connected therewith, such a8 gar- dens, outhouses,and apprtenances neces- sary for the domestic comfort of the dwell- Hon. J. G. Lyles - Page 8 ing house or that in which the business is conducted. In its limitations,the immunity intended is analogous to that which applies to the curtilage of which the common law speaks, and does not ren- der unreasonable the search of woods, fields, ravines, or open spaces not so connected with the place of business or dwelling, though owned by the same in- dividual". In McTyre1-sCase, supra, the Court, after referring to the Wolf Case and substantiallyquoting that part of the opinion which we have just quoted, added thereto the following: "That is to say, unless the place to be searched comes within the purview of an unreasonablesearah as above Ian- dicated, the search may uc.made without a warrant." In the recent case of Crave11 v. State, supra, the Appellant was convicted for keeping a bawdy house; as prohibited by Article 514 P. C. Upon his trial objccqion was made to the admission of testimony by witnesses, one of whom was deputy sher- iff, as to what they saw in appellant'shouse by leek+ ing through a window. In passing upon this sbjection, the Court said: "Appellantnsxt contends that such testimony was inadmissibleunder Article 727a, C. C. P., which prohibits the use of evidence obtained by an officer er other person,'in vwlation af the laws of this State, because, at the time,the witnesses saw what was transpiringin the hcuse, they were tresspassersa "Whether the parties were guilty ef a civil tresspass is beside the question and is immaterial,because the statute mentioned has applicaticnto the viola- tion of laws of this State, and there is no statute making it an offense merely to go upon the premises or property of anotker.. Hence the facts fail te ahw that the parties were guilty of a 0firina1 . Hon. J. G. Lyles - Page 9 tresspass merely because they were on the appellant'spr4mises, or that in so doing, they violated any statute. The provi- sions of Article 727a, C. C, P., relied upon is, therefore,neither applicable nor controllinghere." Deputy game and fish wardens are public of- ficers of this State who are charged by statute with the duty of enforcing the gam4, fish and oyster laws of the State.~ Articles 905, 906, 914, 9'.9, 9'78f, Sections 1 and 6. The general rule is that an offi- cer acting in the performanceof his duty,does not commit a civil tresspass unless he,orceeds the au- thority under which he acts. 41 Tax. Jur., 409, Sec. 2 et seq; 43 Am. Jur. 585, sec. 273, 52 Am. Jur. 864, Sec. 41. In view of what we have heretofore said andthe authorities.cited,It is our opinion that Article 919 is a.valid Statute and confers upon deputy game and fish wardens all the authority it purports to give them. Such offiaers may legally at any time enter upon including in- vi lands* closed land, or water *nt,in this State whcr4 wild game or fish are knoti to range or stray for any or all of the purposes enumerated in said Article, and may legally so do without a search warrant and over the protest of the owner or the person in charge or possession thereof. SUMMARY Article 919, Penal Code, does not attempt to confer authority upon deputy game and fish wardens to search without a warrant, the house in which one dwells or in which he works and does business, and those things connected therewith, such as gardens, outhouses,and appur- tenances nec4saary for the domestic COEI- fort of the dwelling house or in which the business is conducted.. Deputy game and fish wardens may legally at any time, enter upon any lands, &cluding inclosed lands, or way ter within this State where wild game or fish are known to range or stray for Hon. J. G. Lyle.5- Page 10 any of the purposes enumerated in Article 919, 'Penal Code, without a search.warbant, and over the'protest of the owner or per- son in charge or possession thereof. Yours very truly, ATTORNEY GENERALOF TEXAS .. A-i'TORNEP. GENERAL OF TEXAS BWB/LH/erc APPROVED? OPINION COIWtTTEE By B,W.B., CHAIRMAN