Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

.. -. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN Ron. Vocdard Bass countyAttorney Wichita County Wichita Falls, Texas Dear Sir: Opinion llo. O-6982 Ret Conatructlon of Sec. 6, Article 1, Senate Bill 167 applications vlth ment of Education Your request for op fully considered by this depa quest a8 follows: legislature provldes, applications muat be partment not later than eceipt and acceptance of such e County Superintendent prior to a euffiolsnt compllanoe to 8ecure State Aid or is a strict compliance, e.g. filing with the State department by that date neceaaary?” . . Hon. Woodard Bass - Page 2 Article 2696, Vernon’s Annotated Texas Civil Statutes, provides as follovsr “Any child lavfully enrolled in any district or independent district, may by order of the county superintendent, be transferred to the enrollment of any other district or independent district in the same county upon a written application of the parent or guardian or person having lavful con- trol of such child, filed vith the county superin- tendent; provldod that any district or independent district being dissatisfied vlth any transfer made by the county superintendent may appeal from such action to the county board of trustees of said county vho shall hsve the right ti armul and cancel the transfer alloved by the county superintendent. “The applicant shall stats In said applica- tion that it la his. bona fide intention to send said child to the school to which the transfer is asked. “Upon the certification of the transfer of any child, from one district to another district, by the county superintendent of the county In vhich~ the child resldea at the time of the transfer, the State Department of Education shall authorize the State Treasurer to pay over directly the per caplta apportionment, in independent districts of five hundred (500) or more scholastic population, to the district to which such child is transferred; and in all other districts, to county superintendents, to be paid by him to the respective districts to which such children are transferred; provided, no trans- fer shall bs made after August 1st. Acts 1905 p. 263; Acts 1935, 44th Leg. p. 488, ch. 201, 41." Section 6, Article I, Senate Bill 167, 49th Legis- lature of Texas, reads as follovsr "lo adjustments of transfers or cen3us channes made after November 1st of the current school year shall be recognized in making grants of any type of aid under the provisions of this Act.” . . Hon. Woodard BaS8 - Page 3 There can be no doubt but what Section 6, Article I, supra, is a mandatory statute and one highly penal in nature. It clearly eatabllshes a "deadline time In vhlch "adjustments of tr&sfers or census changes" must be made. See Opinion No. g-6953 of thle department. vhich dealt vlth a fact situation vherein an independsntschool district rendered a scholastic roll to the county superintendent; the census taker having by error dated tvo birth dates a year later than the true dates vere; the county superintendent struck off the names of the two children vhose birth dates vere lmpro- perly dated; the roll was aent in to the State Superintendent prior to November 1st; the error vas later discovered and the county superintendent after Hovember 1st made a change and sent in a corrected roll to the State Superintendent. Upon said fact situation it vas held in Onlnlon No. 04953 that the corrected and changed scholastlc'roll V&filed-too late under Article I. Section 6. supra. We enclose herevlth a copy of saLd opinion. We think Opinion No. O-6953 is correct and re- affirm sane, hovever, for the reasons hereinafter pointed out, it is our opinion that neither opinion No. O-6953 nor Section 5 of Article I, supra, have any application to the fact situation about vhioh you inquire. The facta stated by you reveal merely that transfera of ninety six scholastics vere received and accepted by the county superintendent prior to August 1, 1945 (on July 24, 1945) and were not protested to the County Board, and said ninety six transfers vere not transmitted to the State De- partment of Education until November 11, 1945. There vas no change, correction or adjustment of aqld transfers ma&e in '~ any vay; ninety six scholastics were transferred and no change, correction or modification or adjustment of the number of transfers vas sought by the school. It ia our view that in such situation there is not involved any Hadjustmenta of trans- fers3 as contemplated by Section 6 of Article I, supra. Uebater's Nev International Dictionary, Second Edi- talon, unabridged, in defLning the term "adjuatmant" atates aa follovs? 1. "Act or process of adjusting, or state of being adjusted; rpecif.. the bringing of a thing or things into proper or exact position or con- - Hon. Wocdard Bass - Page 4 dltlon; arrangement; settlement; as, adjustment of the calendar; an amicable adjustment. *. . . “3. Bookkeeping. An entry or entries to correct or modify accounts, esp. entries made at the end of a period to show the true condition at that time. "SpL Suiting, fitting, arrangement, regulation, settlement, adaptation, disposition, rectification." The distinction betveen en "adjustment" of assessments and a ere-assessment" is that an adjustment is a correction of . inequalities in the original assessment of the various lands, vNle a "re-assessment" is a new determination of the benefits. Broadway Main Street Bridge District v. Mortgage Loan & In- surance Agency, 112 S. W. (2) 648, 649, 195 Ark. 390. Words I%Phrases, Vol. 2, pp. 424,425. Having concluded that there is no 'adjustment of trans- fers' involved In your fact situation, it is our opinion that Section 6 of Article I, supra, is no bar to the right of Burk- burnett Independent School District to receive State aid for the scholastic transfers inquired about. Very truly yours ATTORNEYOENERAL OFTEXAS BY . Wm, J. Fanning Aseiataat