Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN GROVERSELLERS ATTORNLY GENERAL Eonarable Oaorge & 8heppud comptrouu of Public Aaoourltr Aurt LO, Toxm Dou 8lrI yo u lno lo so 4 l let tu nt lr mo d out , wh le hamount of #a $&p to this la-, %Q thlr tha Jr4 der of Be tedor, 1.0. thewaurootobebaudtb4 J eve strled &aa wmb0rd amtw aad vhereqm cm0 the plalatlff, the stat0 of PbxaI, adlog la behalf of 1twlf bad for sallcounty,~nrl for uw us+ lad bonefttof all poutba rubdl*lrlom er Ml4 oouat rhoDo : .taxea uo colleoted by tbo &8@mwr or 80 &leotorr uonorabk aoorgmI. 8hop$ma,p&a p for taxer for ml& t&m 4ofowlaat, 3.B. Oount~, a& Cr*lo ad aU paHi lnaouooed read7 for trial tha *Lmt%ff lppe.81 ltr Couaty Attorney 0) sell coua~, Turr XL thfWkd< rp~U’h& 10 porroo aad by hfr rttornoyj a jury be; lWlJ valved, all wttrrI, of fmt lr uo 3 Z-of s u, voro rutmlttod to the Court, Yho Oort harln6 hoar4 tb pleadlngo, rti- 4eaco oubmltted t&roua&r aal ufpe8t of aoun- 8.1, @a6 10 oonawtloa thoreu1th havl vlwd b the plaiatiff a&ddof.&t, #A??‘: :’ W.-b IO to Ul pultlrr for thlr Qowt to lnto r ju4Qm8t 8s *Iwo wt fo r th* “It appouictfs to tho hurt tbt IQU aoatro- llt18 tt&eHfom, orderod, M tadgadu@ de- creed tq the Court that thuo lr d uo ovlng and ua@d to p&l&f l.n the cagloltr ia vhloh it awl the follovln& a8ouatr of tuor m .0&8 for tho #olloulq oars npon sb foI&wlag 68oorlbed fro'oW&;~m,ut ln tb 8ahodub Umod~t.1~ (Bore folleur a of tb vuio~r dsmriptioa piearm of popotty of tho aaomtr rod a rtrtomept of taxes due oa oaoh plot of propeel for o-h of the fears in Qw8tlon. f l . l .. ‘It 1s furtbor ordorrd that la the wont the a0fraburt p~8 tb whmt of ~1889.pr topthOr with the oostr of thl8 ru1t to th opu puww8 au- thorLud to recolrr the maeI pf;,a lwh offiarr 8h tillWCUteti deliQU t0 tb afOCi&&, l PO- par reoolpt rbovllythe mat of the tuor due l8 ebavo wt forth la ‘lo j-at 18 entered for w furtlmr tues, pmaltlos or late oat t&a l 8boro set forth la the ~01 of W09&, rod all otbsr mmttors raloea by the plsedlago uo horobr adjudloatrd. Y@t rowmst oar dvloo u to tb prOyIPen8v.r to mske to t&8 qusrtioa sublttob io k. Zlprlqpr a letter. rMuq\uat UI ralorer tmrr bear late&t at 6 wr saaum aad subjeot the twpayu to a pomltr up to 81 , &tlalo 73%, Voraoa*r Amotstw3 Cltl.l~st~tukr. 3rifl rtst- at0 fart&r pa-oribm that “the luo mw ld oolleotor of tame ahall ealQPlrto rrr4 0h8rgs 8ll rwh pefk8ltlo8, later- lst and oortr oa tia bolluqeat tax 8tatemeats or dellnquestlt tu roaoipta l*Hu6 by bl8. Althou& vo hv8 fotxadao Texrriauthorlty directly llr point, luthorltlos ln o&w url8dlatloas iodioato that of.t~ th eg ir o p r lo Ub 8lotfoo of iho oourt la romlttlag the la- trrost a& arltf la this momsay bo opoa to utloua qwr- t 1oar me0F1 O.J., 1194, een1a it 18 Uldl %I the 8bwBao of the oourtr Iwo a0 povor to paprr fra polwltkr InourreObr stat&or provldl~ tbrrofar . . . aumber of derlrioae Wwd otlm kvottholorr, tba oourt aJaQu4stlombly bd juris- Ustloa both of tb tier and of t& r*jeattttor. tbler such oireastuuos, ?s judgmeat, wt boiry void oa its faoe, nhouldbo followed lo the ebraaoo of its kwlng oet aaid oa a-1 op ln a direat grocticuiig lnstlttika for ths purpoma o f mttfng o sm la 6e. a the rweat awe OS Stevut 011 Cooprayto loa, 173 8.Y. ( $a) 791, error retuaed for vant of merit, JuUga J&n Speu holdd, tar @&itlonU caass 00 hold-, w, PI Tous olgest w %4#88t, yf’ 470. ‘. >, YUJ willy ~OurB AImRJm ORmEtALOF Trn