,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
AUSTIN
GROVERSELLERS
ATTORNLY GENERAL
Eonarable Oaorge & 8heppud
comptrouu of Public Aaoourltr
Aurt LO, Toxm
Dou 8lrI
yo u
lno lo so 4 l let
tu
nt lr mo d out
, wh le hamount
of #a $&p
to this la-,
%Q thlr tha Jr4 der of Be tedor, 1.0.
thewaurootobebaudtb4 J eve strled &aa
wmb0rd amtw aad vhereqm cm0 the plalatlff,
the stat0 of PbxaI, adlog la behalf of 1twlf bad
for sallcounty,~nrl for uw us+ lad bonefttof
all poutba rubdl*lrlom er Ml4 oouat rhoDo :
.taxea uo colleoted by tbo &8@mwr or 80 &leotorr
uonorabk aoorgmI. 8hop$ma,p&a p
for taxer for ml& t&m 4ofowlaat, 3.B.
Oount~, a&
Cr*lo ad aU paHi lnaouooed read7 for trial
tha *Lmt%ff lppe.81 ltr Couaty Attorney 0)
sell coua~, Turr XL thfWkd< rp~U’h&
10 porroo aad by hfr rttornoyj a jury be;
lWlJ valved, all wttrrI, of fmt lr uo 3 Z-of
s u, voro rutmlttod to the Court,
Yho Oort harln6 hoar4 tb pleadlngo, rti-
4eaco oubmltted t&roua&r aal ufpe8t of aoun-
8.1, @a6 10 oonawtloa thoreu1th havl
vlwd b the plaiatiff a&ddof.&t, #A??‘: :’
W.-b IO to Ul pultlrr for thlr Qowt to lnto r
ju4Qm8t 8s *Iwo wt fo r th*
“It appouictfs to tho hurt tbt IQU aoatro-
llt18 tt&eHfom, orderod, M tadgadu@ de-
creed tq the Court that thuo lr d uo ovlng and
ua@d to p&l&f l.n the cagloltr ia vhloh it
awl the follovln& a8ouatr of tuor m .0&8 for
tho #olloulq oars npon sb foI&wlag 68oorlbed
fro'oW&;~m,ut ln tb 8ahodub Umod~t.1~
(Bore folleur a of tb vuio~r
dsmriptioa
piearm of popotty of tho aaomtr
rod a rtrtomept
of taxes due oa oaoh plot of propeel for o-h
of the fears in Qw8tlon. f
l
. l ..
‘It 1s furtbor ordorrd that la the wont the
a0fraburt p~8 tb whmt of ~1889.pr topthOr with
the oostr of thl8 ru1t to th opu puww8 au-
thorLud to recolrr the maeI pf;,a lwh offiarr
8h tillWCUteti deliQU t0 tb afOCi&&, l PO-
par reoolpt rbovllythe mat of the tuor due
l8 ebavo wt forth la
‘lo j-at 18 entered for w furtlmr tues,
pmaltlos or late oat t&a l 8boro set forth la
the ~01 of W09&, rod all otbsr mmttors raloea
by the plsedlago uo horobr adjudloatrd.
Y@t rowmst oar dvloo u to tb prOyIPen8v.r to
mske to t&8 qusrtioa sublttob io k. Zlprlqpr a letter.
rMuq\uat UI ralorer tmrr bear late&t at 6
wr saaum aad subjeot the twpayu to a pomltr up to 81 ,
&tlalo 73%, Voraoa*r Amotstw3 Cltl.l~st~tukr. 3rifl rtst-
at0 fart&r pa-oribm that “the luo mw ld oolleotor of
tame ahall ealQPlrto rrr4 0h8rgs 8ll rwh pefk8ltlo8, later-
lst and oortr oa tia bolluqeat tax 8tatemeats or dellnquestlt
tu roaoipta l*Hu6 by bl8.
Althou& vo hv8 fotxadao Texrriauthorlty
directly
llr point, luthorltlos ln o&w url8dlatloas iodioato that
of.t~
th eg ir o p r lo Ub 8lotfoo of iho oourt la romlttlag the la-
trrost a& arltf la this momsay bo opoa to utloua qwr-
t 1oar me0F1 O.J., 1194, een1a it 18 Uldl
%I the 8bwBao of
the oourtr Iwo a0 povor to
paprr fra polwltkr InourreObr
stat&or provldl~ tbrrofar . . .
aumber of derlrioae Wwd otlm
kvottholorr, tba oourt aJaQu4stlombly bd juris-
Ustloa both of tb tier and of t& r*jeattttor. tbler
such oireastuuos, ?s judgmeat, wt boiry void oa its faoe,
nhouldbo followed lo the ebraaoo of its kwlng oet aaid oa
a-1 op ln a direat grocticuiig lnstlttika for ths purpoma
o f mttfng o sm la 6e.
a the rweat awe OS Stevut 011 Cooprayto loa,
173 8.Y. ( $a) 791, error retuaed for vant of merit, JuUga
J&n Speu holdd,
tar @&itlonU caass 00 hold-, w, PI Tous olgest
w %4#88t, yf’ 470.
‘.
>, YUJ willy ~OurB
AImRJm ORmEtALOF Trn
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Combined Opinion