Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN Sonor4bl4 A. P. Al.li40a County Attorney Kerr oounty lw-rrulo, Toma 904r sir; opblon no. 0-6560 4 o bo held on kr ot nocnt bat.4 on the &bore your lottar 44 r0110w4t 41 oourt oi K4rr hat I write your n th4 10g41ity or I' oourt 4pproprirtlng g0110ni ma8 0f tb urp044 of p4yiq 44larlos 244 of 4 suprrlsed phygrouaa rponoozwd by th4 oity, rohool 0 orgmlse tiona. .Tho oemi&~lonarm* court ha8 rurthsr reqieated t&at Z obtain your opinion le to th4 i0g4iity 0r th0 4xp0tditm or i4b0n0~ from th4 ~4n4x-41 runafor th4 4xpn80 0r ban6 oonoertm to bo hold 04 the publlo rqusro during th4 8w44r montha.r It ia ~411 srtabliraed !n tLi4 dtato that Vi. county oom4l4413Aerr* oourt has oaly iuob ruthority 44 18 l xpri44ly 00nr8rrcta or a4c48aarily tnplisd upon it by th4 COASt,$tUtiOn 44~ l4 tut08 0r tub st4 t0. #T’ tb In 4434 of Pdu4Sd4 County V. JWAingS, (CfV. APR.) 33 j. if. 585, tho oourt hold that oountl48 are ooolponrnt Forts of th4 State 4nd h4r4 no poworr or butler 4xo8pt thors rhloh an3 sot forth rnd brrin0a in the Con8titutim 4Ad sktutrr. ,rhe rtrtutorI've olrrrly drfinrd the pomrr, prmoribed tho dut.148, 8~4 inp084d th4 114bilitiO8 Of tho o08IQiSSiOAsrS' oourt - the a8Qiua through rhioh tho ditfermt oountiar @et - ana rr~a thoro rktukl must eon8 all th@ 8UthOritieS To8kd iA tho 00Ullti48. In U %x48 Jurirprudmoe, Section 37, pp 5664-565, wo find th. iol.bminf$ Lan@uigoI '9. . . . Coami8~lon*rs~ oourtr 4r4 oourtr of ll.dtOd jUAsdlOtl~, in bh8t their 4uthOrity rxtoaba only to a4tt4rr prt4inin to the g4n4r4l neILfare of their rerpotiro oount f 48 and that their power8 4n only thorn rxpe8sl.y or lapllodly oonfrmd upon thar by 14r, - that 14, by thm con- 8titUtiOA End StEtUtOS Or thi8 8klt8. , .” (at- LA&ISUA Fe or rhOtriO Li&ht Ceaiprw v. Keena~, 30 3, if.88 8; :uu couty V. 'JurLit0n 273 8. vt. 2921 Terplo Luber Company T. Oomli8rloA44rr* Court or Sabine County,.~exsg, 239 5; 1. 668; tit 0r Breokenridgo i. St4ph4ns county (2af 405~ mm-4 V. bf0min44 cotay, 275’sYrf*4%~ Seward fr Balls County, 2&6 Y, ‘d, 728; 4nd other o448r). d. h4T4 bibsA unebla t0 S&id 44 OOA8titUtiOAEl Or statutory 4uthority rhioh would 8uthorize th8 oozimisslonarr* 00ut or 4 oounty to 0~~~26 ooimty runa8 for the jwpo848 rot out abow. xn ~14~ or the ran ing, it i8 tha 0pini0n 0r.tai8 d4pmrtmat that tha eomai~ar oners* court or Kerr county is not luthorlrod to a s kl sxp8ndltturr rroa tho tinrnl lucid to p4y 4414rior End 8xpen4cr in oonnsotion with a ruprrri44d playigouad progrra rpon8orad by the oity, rrhool and ai*14 ;iOA. A* ?. filiSOA, !@e. 3 Org4AiS4t~OA8, Or t0 J0y 4Xp4A488 iAOid8At t0 holding ,b,4nd OOnO0rtSon the publie rquere, $,' 84 trust bat w4 hev4 r4tl8f4otorily anawerrd your inquiry. BY JAilLJ A88iStEAt