Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN the eokauwledginents,sad 10 fu 81)I hers beon able to learn naver made a atkargm either$0 the shrrlttor oap otliw person ?er moh aa?- rloea am a fotuy PubUo. lo oharm warnlvw mdi to Bidalp uoaaty. m mreaba of 19u th*.6barltt'* 6alo an tax p?opertloawas an- tlmlall$largo. Short&#a,ftar the Shartff'r Derdrhad .boulturned overto the Ooua8y thus ram presented to aa a bill fm $148.00 fop liofuy f**a. US anaurtadl Bhrt @or opinfon O-5356 by a former ALBtoraey Donerel,4udd 0. ~fsa2u1, the AttorneyOeasral hap ruledI +&at it was tm i depaayrherltton .adiralght le(gaI- ,.,,,....:;.:: HonorableB. F. aCcKe8, Faga ) wFowth, aestmlngthat It wouId br legel tar euoh ehar$eeto be ~tleito the Cbtuttt-for nrtloae ar a Motuy Publlo,18 It poeeltilafos e de My sherift,en aaployaaof ths County,to lnebPt&to a suit against the Countyuhloh roqld.atiers the aoIhotlon of thla aoaouut? HonorableE. F. MoKae, Page k aoocmpanylng suah report with laoolore oovulng euoh putbhaeorand rtquleltlane lse~oed by him in supportof eaoh report. IS eaoh rxpenereEs in- oartrd in oon~~otloadth eey par~loalu oaer, euoh rrpost ehell mna euah oeea. Saab report, involoee,and r~qul8lbloasehall be subjsoti to th8 aualt of the oountyauditor,if any, othat- wlu by the Commlemloii~re Court, an4 ii it sppeare any item wee not bmurmd sthat~ by such oflleet, or thateuohitem~II not l neo r eea r yor legal oxpwme of euah offlo*,ot rohamd upcm ptopsr ltam she1r bo by sela oeuaty rrqrtleltlon,'ettah '980 ~l#$slot~ditio rlull bo peld by tha 8tete Hldr&o CwMtiyoOmpeneet+e6 lk emaMy offlaormaa ot on antwl salary, aad the prorlolfmeof Seo-