Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

c OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN QROVKR SELLERS Al-mnNmv OLNLIUL n--sue John It. Ehook crl8laal MBtrlat Attommy mx8r county 8M Antoalo, hnr Attentlonr L. s. oittlqger Proi your CeQue8t fm- ItCument8, ve rate the follov ion 18 based; lr r lty 18ro dated ?ebru- U both deed8 were filed nty clerk OQ krch 14, \ d tlrCt Va8 pUNbr8ed frCR the Cfty Of . cribed c8 tract8 number8 One (1) @ad d Elovember 2, 1915, executed jointly by w io and 88ld Board of Trulteel, and re- , page8 72-75, of the Deed Record8 Of Beur 0. Il. Pitshugh Secretary Of the Board of ‘haltee of the Ualverrfty, In 8 iette? dated kroh 14, 1945, 8t8teS that I 5ai8 property ha8 beNi W$Ubed to beCOW Wt Of tb campu8 05 the Triait7 Vtiverrlty. Ia l letter dated April a, 1945, pitthugh reQue8t8 the comml88lau9r8’ court to exert Honor~le John R. Woo&, page 2 the prOP8rtf dercrlbed ln th8 petltlon and "e-e1 any aad al.1 tUe8 WiNiort @bid Property bes[iaafag Jaauu~ 1, 1925.' ‘lOU lk the OpitiOil Oi thi8 depArtnot Whether the propert deroribed above a8 ‘flrrt trhot’ an13 %eoond traata 18. exe-t from the wy’B8nt Of kua, ~ue8tloMbl~, the fir8t trot cannot be exempt ire0 taxer for 1945. the Uader Artlole J*u ?lSl, 811 proper- ty %eld Or ovned OR Oha firrt day of Jaa~ar2 In tb yeu Sor vhlc~ tk property 18 FOqrrired to be 118ted or readered" rurt be llrted for taxation betvoen Jenuuy 1 a& Apdl 30. The ovnership of property 011 the SirIt Qay of January of luy mar create8 b ll~blllt~ OrAthe gut of the cvner for tUe8 levied upou ruch propert for that em. Vlnterr v. Itiepen&at School Dlrtrict of huh, 205 8.V.574. Slnoe thir property ~18 prlmtely on Jan-y 1, ovard i 1945, the tU u8rUed a8 b@inat th8 caner8 date MI! on t&t the7 ry not bc curcelled or removed from tkm tu roll8 regUd- le88 of 8ny UIY to vhleh it Uy thereafter b8 dediarted. A8 V8 Mid in ~itiioli BO. o-49%1 -either the cOII8titUtiOn nor the 8tatUte8, hovever, releUe or authorire the releme or cuI- cellation OS 8d valorem tuer vhlch amWmd prior to the date on vhiah luch propert 18, by 8UCh polltlacl 8ubdiri8~oo, devoted to public U8e.' It should be noted that ?rinitj OUlrer8ity Va8 C&t- ed by a rpecl81 ChUter goUted by the 12th h.Si8kture Of the &ate of T~XW in1870. Special ull8, 12th Xagl8%tkWe, Cal&d &3881OIi, 1870, p. 160, ah. 83. sea tioo 13 of thir ohuter provider: *phb propert uvned aad held by Hid imti- tution being 8et apart eXelU8lvel7 rar education- al puTpO8e8, 18 herob deobred to be exe@ from both St&te 4uLd CoUty TU4tiOk’ &otion 56 of Article XII of the Con8t~tutIo~ Of ~~-8 (1876), vhich 18 in Sub8tMti~llJ the 8- mw%e l8 c 155 Boaorable John 8. 8hook, wge 3 , 8 *ail&rPmi@ioQ In the CoB8tItUtim OS 1869, vkioh vav ;a effect V&n thi8 clnrtw va8 granted, pOvide8: Ve therefore hold that the provl8loa 0s 8e8t:oa 15 of the URlterrit~~r ohrter i8 ineffeotual, la ltrels, to CrWte the 8Xemptloa Of thin Droperlj rougbt v t& Va:rer8:tf in it8 ~tit:OlL The PollOy Of the 8tate regarding th e lurptlon ooa- fained Ia AdiCb 7150, 8eCtiOll 1, Revlaed Civil 8t8tUte8, p8r- taiala(l ta mho018, 18 Very OtUly 8t8tOd by Jurtlae Aobwt8on in Ca88iaao V. Pr8ullM Academy, (1885) 65 Tex. 673, 675: ti8 been the policy “It of the rtate 8fnee la9 to encourage edueatloml laterprl8m by ox- lrptlag them from any &are of thv burtin of government. . . . - Om8titUtior. Of 1876, 80 far fromwdlf~lrrg thlr policy, mker 8unlSloent ~ovl8lon8 for the ulntenaaae of free rohoolr. There h a been s ao latbgooia botveea the public and private 8cho018, to varraat the inference that the framers of tbo aomrtltutloa, in the we of the vord bulldlag, fatended 8 rplteful &lrerlmlM- tim 8gcia8t privct& 8chOOl8. "The educ~tlOa of the 8b88e8 18 WV reoog- \. afred a8 & fuactloa of 8tbte gorerturat. Those vho, iron charitable oon8ider8tioa8, to forvard c. 8ectmlti 7lev8, or for private profit, &are or- pniged or oouducted 88hOol8, h&v8 888i8ted the atate in the performuSe of 8 duty it We8 to it8 Citf8ea8, VbiOh CaaDOt be to0 tkOWhl7 perfo-# &Ud vh:ch the 8tate b8 ua ver l88Uwd tht it had e;thvr the me&D8 OF the rohlaery of dOW v~f- fiolvatly veil vlthout private lvvivtmWv* Thv m8ulim Academy 18 perforuirrg ft8 plrt 18 fhl8 branch of the public 8ervice, cad lt 8bould vatiMr be ewowae& bz ald8, thaa -tied la lt8 U8e- tulaa88 b y l tU UPOa it8 PitflU revenU88. c 156 . Hoaorablc John R. Shook, mge 4 (I . . . , "All the building8 and all the lmd 80-t to be 8old by lppellaat Vera mCe88UJ and u8ed for thb ProPer and eeoaomlcal of the conduct rchool. . . . The grow&d8 vu8 ured for the recreation or the pupll8, and to 8upp17 the 8ch001 vlth v8get8bh8. Author%7 18 aot mating to ox- tedth e lUp tfOnto bid much lerr direct17 la- PloYct to iorvud the lnterertr of the rchool.. . . . &ate ~iaevvil& v. beMu college, 150 Ca. 156, 103 9.B. 164, vhloh cite8 aad reliee upon the brr;ano case. the Court, vhf18 reCOgQi8lrrg 88 rblutuy the rule tht a statute exempting ProPertJ from tubtloa 18 to be strictly eba8trued, 88ld t \ '~8V8rth81088,bulldl.ngrerected SOP and U8bd a8 col1.agr8, lmeorporated ~bdellel, and 8emlnarle8 0s barnlag br8 oru811~ perunent la character. In 8 rel8tlve 8ea8e the7 8re iaov8bl8. When, ther8fOre,89 8OleM la iit8trWOtit 88 8h@ cOn8tf- tution SUtbOl’im8 the exemption Of 811 Such bulld- lag8, 8ad vhea the general l88embly la lx e r a l8- la g it8 pwer 80 corrferred upon it ex8mptr from taxation all 8uCh bulldlQ~8, 0s a aoartructloo the rtatute COa8ormat vlth the pUFpO80 of the ex- emption and the 8ettled policy of th8 date, 88 reflected by the exemptlag rtatute, mU8t be adopt- \. ed. Bulldlagr ~111 therefore be COQ8trued to em- br8ce the 18ad upon vhich they 8re loc8ted and the w 18nd 8d.lacent thereto aece88arv for their Dp?oDcr U8C. occumitm~ and ealommat, provided, of coW8e* 'the property be oat Used for purpore8 Of Pitate or corpor8te profit or Income.*' t-818 our81 Ia thi8 and many other aa8e8 it V88 held th8t reCre8- t;oa ground8 aad campus ere Included vithia the exeaption. The &termimtioQ 88 t0 the are8 of laud vithfn 8 tu exemtion ex- tended to pr0pertp used for eduo8tion8lpurpa8e8 18 governed generally by the aecer8ity, or lack of neCe88ltlr. of the land e 157 Honorable Joha R. bheok, pap 5 fa the r rui aur~if4~ out 0sruoh purpo8er. 3% lxemptloa h88 been held to extend to land thus found to be reason- In rffeot _ ably moerur~ to th e .r ull lxerol8v UrU enjoymat 0s 8uCh pur- POHIe See 134 A.L.R. 1176~ 143 A.L.R. 274. Our Oplaloa lo. O-3083,approved ?ebraaq 15, 1941, pertrlalag to brrd8 brloylry to the College Of Ramhell, 18 la keeping vfth th8 above-citedrullwr, &ad 8tate8, la part: '&cm the above our opltIloa follovr that 'the load on vhlah th8 8ahool plant 18 loo&ted and which 18 used exclu8lvel~for lducatfo~l pWpO808, la- aludlag the aOve88Ur ~u-&r &ad recreatloaal *oundr, fr exempt frdm taxation. . . .' Therefore you are adrl8ed thbt if the Board Of tiU8t8ee h a ve r r de l rhovia& 8uiffOf8nt 80 COavfaCe th4 001111188~oaerl' court that there ha8 been a dedlaatloa of the property referred t0 &I tF8Ct tV0 (If) ib OUF 8tmMIt Of f&t8 t0 the PUWO8e8 for vhloh it 188 acquired, aad IS the court 18 aoatlaced that 8Wh propart 18 r8~8CMbl~ mOe88Uf t0 the flrii lxerof8e urd lajopeat 0s the oduaatfoaal purporer 0s the Ualterrlt~, it 18 exempt from tuatioa bad should act b8 eatered on the roll8 by the Tax A88e88Or M&d COlle@tOr. eUlti.Iig that thir ruii~ au8vu8 four inquiry, ve le Yery truly your8 \. ATTORRETIIalLDlBULOFTRXM