Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

THXCA~ITORNEY GENERAL OF -XAS Hondriible Dave McXVeill,Jr. County AttotiheyJ. Shelby County Center,,.Tsxas ,. _ ; Dear Sir; Opinion ~0~.,~0~~911-” ‘- ‘- -’ Ret Does..a oommon school district ^. . which transfers its,entire scholastic enrollment’to an ac- credited school of higher rank by one-year contracts for three consecutive years thereby con- soli,datewith the receiving school, and related questions? We acknowledge receipt of your letter of March 2, 1944, lnwhioh you request an opinion of this department on the following questions; “1. Does a common school district which transfers its entire scholastic enrollment to an accredited school of higher rank by one- year contracts for three consecutive years thereby consolidate with the receiving school? “2. Does the County Board of Trustees have the authority to consolidate a common school district with its receiving school in the state of facts outlined in Number 1. “3. where an election is held within a common school district for the purpose of elect- ing school trustees for such school district, what length of time must a voter reside in such common school district in order to qualify him to vote in the election?” . _ -. . Hon. Dave. McNeill, Jr. page 2 O-5911 pour first two questions are, no doubt. prompted by the provisions of Article 8, Ch. 373, of the aural Aid Bill for 19 (Acts 1943, 48th Lag. R. S., 8, B. 176). Section 1 o Article 8 reads, in part, as,,foilows: _ "Upon the agreement of the board of trustees of the districts concerned or on petition signed by a majority of the quali- fied voters of the district and subject to the approval of the county superintendent and the State Auperintendent, a district which may be unable to maintain a satisfactory school may transfer its entire scholastic,enrollment for one year to an accredited school of higher rank. a .' This*provision authorized under certain circum- stances the transfer of one school district's entire scholastic enrollment for one year to an accredited school of higher rank, but it does not authorize the legal consolidation of districts. Article 2896, R. S. 1925, sets out the procedure for consol- idating districtsand provides for the calling and holding of an election for such purpose in each of the districts to be affected by the consolidation. The County Board of ‘rustees as such have no statutory authority to effect a consolidation of school districts without a vote of the people in each of the districts affected. We, therefore, answer your first two questions in the negative. The qualffications of voters in _elections - ._ In. - common school districts for the purppse of electing son001 trustees for such school districts are governed by Section 2, Article 6 of the Constitution of Texas, which reads-in part as followsr "Every person subject to none of the fore- * going,disqualifications, who shall have at- tained the age of 21 years and who shall be a citizen of the United States and who shall have resided in this State one year next preceding an election and the last six months within the district or county in which such person offer; to vote, shall be deemed a qualified elector; Hon. Dave McNeill, Jr. page 3 O-5911 Although there are certain constitutional and statutory provisions requiring an elector to vote in the election precinct of his residence, there is no required length of time for such residence as a,,qualificationfor voting in a schocl trustee election in a common school district. Shaw V. Taylor, 146 9. WN. (2) 452. Trusting'that the foregoing answers your in- quiries, we are Your.8very truly ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS ,~ .- .,~,.,. BY Pagan Dickson Assistant FDsBT/pam -,. .. , APPROVED MAR 8 1944 GEo..~P,.BSrAFKBURNACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ,TEXAS ii'i'i6iED O$iiiON &tii~T~ BY BWB, CHAIRMAN