Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Court: Texas Attorney General Reports
Date filed: 1943-07-02
Citations:
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Combined Opinion
         OFFICE   OF THE     ATTORNEY GENERAL                          OF   TEXAS
                                AUSTIN




gonorrble     Xr Me TrMlr,          Pirrt           Arrirtuat
8trtr     uuperintubduAt
                      of ruolio Iaotruot10a
Austin, Tour




                                                                       ot which har'
                                                                       8 rohoola for




                                                       ral4tit. to the fcll~ai~qj
                                                           rOqU4Dkd t0 46TiBe          t:iO



                                                ~PdOat  8chool Dlatrlct
                                                a mu'plur of State and
                                            )   8ft.r           thmr   h8TO oon-
                           or 4     period of right montha.
                            your       0pmoR                u      to whether,
                           rlJrl8      of8897 or the
                                                 Artlolr
                      Gtatutrs,  thlr aurplu ma7 k
                        8 p4ymnt on the outmuadlng
         bonded indobtednrrrof thr rehool dlrtclat.1 "

            Artlob 2027, Rerlred Cltll St&tutra, 1926, nqdr
 u      follw8a

            lThr publio f'zw rohoolfun41&all no tba
         oxpondmdexcept for the followingpurpo~or:
wx'abl. T. if.Triable, pa;,             .+2




       '1.    Tb     6ktO     Uid oo\mty aWlabl@                iwd#
    ‘ha bll
          eused
              lxolurlre4               for      the    pa    lnt ot
    mohem~         and   ‘uporintondontl~          rrlu 7"
                                                         .I) f0.r
    for taking an rohol~8tio OwmU‘# aad lntrrert
    OnBOM~bOX'XWWd 011BhOPtthOtO     W w1Ui.B
    ef 6oaoh.m and                when thwr
                            euporlntead‘ntr,
    raluler  brow           dw beion     tb.a
                                aohool funda for
    tlw oamont yur beoomo rvall~blrJprovided thaC
    no loans for the purpo88          of paymoat            of teacher8
    rhall k paid eut of fundr other than them. ior
    the thon O~Jrlwrdi yeare
         "9. Looal rohool fund8 t’rar dlrtrlot tue8,
    tultlon  Se08 OS pup118 not ontitledto irae
    tuition  wad other local aouroe~my be wed for
    th8 purporor rnumentrd tar State end county
    fun48 and for purah~ring lppllano~sand suppllar,
    for the pqaent of inouranorprmluw,    jaltore
    ubd other buployor,for buJlng r&o01 rlter,
    buying,bulldinguxd rsp8lrlng end ranting 812~01
    how.‘, and ior other purpose‘ neorrruy ln t;?e
    oonduot of the pubI& eohoolr to ba doknalned by
    the Board of mY.tee‘, the aooountr and vouahw‘




       In Ada8       vs.            36 s.     1.      (21 128     on reherring
                     taq 0
                         ue8ti0n
                           0~
                            r80l
                            Ml108
u S* I. (2) 2r,                        0r WJ&S stat0 ~m,b
able funda f*r oonrtruotionof rohool bulldlmgr    we8 ooneldar-
rd by the comalrrlon of Appeal&    It wti h.Ld in t&t   oa8e
thet, when tho Stat0 availablefund8 zero sufflolontto
mbtaln thm rehoo1.r OS the dlatriotfar llghtmontb, aad
lravo a rurplur,thr rewlnl~     acne;l oould bo used, uudrr the
                                                                               544




:-.

wasa    prwvlrionr OS Submotion 2 of Artlolr 2227, for bulld-
@g of ‘ch00lhoW.s. It 1s prokbla          that if APtlcle 2327 mere-
w adhorleod ueb or the funds for %qlng, building and n-
#& l”s                          ' it would be ‘uffloIontl~broad to
        l l l ‘0h o o lh c na ‘.‘,
mblr,  ~8. of ‘uoh .rurpluafunds for rotlrerunt      of debts io-
0w.d     for   those purporor     ($80 tow '18~Rookmall IeSIDe (40%.
CUT,App.~ errorrrfurrd) 194 S. Fi.6lQ)jbut the authority
loafurod by the rtrtute sot only Is for %uylag, btilcllng
                                                        and
rpair~    80h00l.h0~808~” but the trU@ke@ era iurthcr author-
ire& to WI rush fund8 "for other pwpo8.8 n.oo‘r~t'y  in th.
gonduot of the publIo school8 to be datunalaed by the Board of
~N‘U)~‘.* Fc Would Ob8bma as did the Condrslon of Appeals
h Adsas vea ?!llor (3b 9.w. (2)125) lo ocrnuidarln~ its eimI1~
problca, rhct t&c Board of Wu8toc‘ , la dotermIning the 1;c.eto
k aado d rwh rurplue ruadr -
         a I)* l 1s repeolally luthorirod to do al~iioaL an>-
         thing deemed nooerrcry In their judgment to lo-
         ocuipli8hthe purposes statedIn 5ectlon 1 or hrtl-
         clc 7 of the Conctltutlon to the cffeot Cat @a
         general dirru8ion of lamwl8~c, talr~~ cucc~#Acl
         to the prerrmtlon of the liberty and right8of
         the paoplo,It ‘AaU.Cd trr6   kut)of t;?aLe&ilo-
         turo of tha State to rrtcblI&h and 14~8 cAtable
         provl~lonior   the     support;   6n.d ~i.ate~~c   df iw
         Ofri0iOnt.y.cem of public r'rec6c:~oolr.'i*'*9.1)

           The lt8tutory &uthorIt~ ccncrralq mc             sf mth   sur:Aue
Stat. lvallablofunds is thwrforc, la our oplnlcn, br*oa&
lnou&h to pumlt USY of luoh find8 ic ret1rcmrr.tof ten-?ed ln-
dobtadrmrr of l eohool di.~rZoc,.


        U8c of roncye dorAred f-am.the oountr lrallablc school
fund Is 1lmIkd by Artlclo 2027, ‘uprar to those purpo8.8  onum-
crated In Subrcctloa 1 oi that rtatuto# neither th8 oonatruotlon
ot bullding nor peynrnt ef uutrtmdiry   lwidod indebtedness 1s
Ppong the l&horlred uaae. Mcmryr dorived trap tha oount avail-
lb & funb,  &areioN,   may not be used to rrtlrr o~tetand1rq
bond‘.