Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE AITORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AIJSTIN Hon. Gee. H. Sheppard Comptroller OS Pub110 Aocotmto state of Texas. Autia, Texe?l DeerSIr: -,* a mbsequcnt o,onthly raymnt for wtor traatote 00~morce to e cuatomr for the ortation rhea seld . thereafter exportad r rather then by the .- any perscn shall.export or lose by fire or other accideat any olctorfuel in c?uantlties02 one hundred (100) i9llons or nor%, so that the 3~318my never be rzade use of within this 3tate, aftor the tax has been paid on such motor fuel, or ahall sell motor fuel upon which the . , 818 Eon. oeo. B. Sheppard, pace 2 tax has~boen paid, in any Quantities, to the Ubiteb States Covammnt, for the exolusive use of said Covernmnt, c1al.mfor refund of the tax so pald xaay be mde in the mnner herein ,nrovided,or au the Co~ptrollor53~ dlroot. E'roviricd,.however, that sbow- in: mat be cad@ that safd tax wss paid or accounted . for by a lloensed and bonded distributor,and tho Coxptrollor shall deduct fro3 such refund the one (1) por oent allowed to dis*txibutors Baking the first sale, distribution or use of notor fuel in Tcxae. Frovldcd, f-urthor. thRt n bond& and licmncd Eiatributor me, In lieu or:filinr &lain for xSur.d of %:!atax raid on notor T'uolthcreaftor ssoorted, or sold to t'ic? Unite& :;tntrsCmcmr?e3t for the oxclu:3lveu3e 0:'asid CGZ- mcnt. taim credit on any nonthly ramrt and tax papen r.aBoto till0 CocHirollorwithin air (6) monthsot the t-Into ot saiiioalc or exuortaCI.03, ior t!:omount of tnx so Jxi?.' *'3cveralTexas distributorswith places of business looated along the border lines oi adjolninlratate and,Old ~xixlcio sol1 30tor fuel.to out of state tank truck operator3 who 00.110 into the.:;tateand puroha30 the motor fuel tron ._ said'~oxas distributors and .thentransport the motor fuel back irttothoLv own state or into Xexloo. Your opinion No. O-24243,written prior.to the above ar.ondr%mt,held that suoh sales were ot intrastate character and :'~ero thus sub&sot to the Ytnte tgx thou@ t?.epurchaser could obtain a refund of sala.taz ii am%wllen he esrmted the saze. : *A3 a nnttar of'bus'lnsssconvenience them Texas i distributors deslro to relieve the out of state tmk truck , purchasersot the burder‘of fil.lnEc1oit-sfor rerun&of the I tax. The distributors propose to pay ttletax themelves and then sell the tax,Iaid notor'fuol to t!reout of state : truckers and when they have been furnished with suffloient . proof OS export by tho task truckers ths distributorswill taka credit oh their next or a-subaoquant tax~roport snd rmlttance for the tax originally paid to the State by thorn. T!:aCan;;tmcker will.then be p,von or&it lor the tax paid to the distributor upon his next gI.rohasefrom said distri- butor, TWO of 'thez&or distributorshave construed the underscored rmograph of the above quoted amndment to authorize jj 3~01:,procedureana have requested an opinion as whether their _ I ,: construotlonharncnizes tith.our view of the anenUment.* j, 1. 819 Eon. Coo. 8, -jhsppnr.rd, page 3 And you rocuest our opinion as followo: *~,~llyou therefore ploese advioe us whether or net, wder t.ixemnd~e3t ns Ouotet herclnabove, a bcr,deCon% licens~ii distributor .%a7take aredit on a subsequent 1~.onthly rs>ort and tax paymnt for motor rue1 sold in Intrastate cozmrce to an out or state oustmer rbl: tfiejzmponc or exportation’ when said p;otortuel is thereattcr exported by the ousto=roz rathex than by the distributor.” Se answer your Questior, no. The gotor Fuel Tax Law in ei?oct at the elm or thl,s amendGent did not ~=ovlUe for a refbnd of the tax pal6 on notor rue1 sold to the ??nitedSetes Covermeht ior its exolnsive use, The above quoted Snendnent was paS33d t0 correct t3.s defeat In the law, and also to allow “beaded md 1icon~aJ Aiatclbutoj:s* to take credit on their nonthly reports .uadeto the Conptrolior far :.ha ammt of tho taxes paid on li;otox ?a4 cxpor:cd by thornor said to tho iJrItad States Covera:.lent‘ for its emlusive use. In ar’ePfo?t to aons5rve tha trmapoitation raoilisies durinq the mr e::rGr- genoy, t2e Co-mrment roquiror~ eaoh distributor to scpgly xotor furl froizthe marest ~ouroe of aupglg to the dellvery point, regardless of whether suoh somce or supply v:asa refinery of the ciatributor or belongs to ahother. Ir the ,zotor fuel suI~pliebby a distributor for emortation OF sale to the fjnltcdSates Goverment o,em fron a ref‘inerynot omod bg the distributor naklnflthe sele, there ~8s no Iro- vision $n ‘Uhelaw for the Uatributor to recover the taxco paid cxccpt by riling a clain for refund. This created a uselcms burden upon the Comptroller and the distributors. It ws hot contmzplated,however, that a bonded or licsxsed distributor could take credit for the tax naid on motor fuel sold to out oi’State truckers. Such a conhtructionwould authorize distributors to ascertain facts about exportation end sale to the United States Government for its exclusive use, thoroby usmping the function or the Comptroller,who is charged uriththe duty,of colleotltq the notor fuel tax. Yours very truly