c ,_.~. ’
383.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF.TEXAS
. AUSllN :
!
Eonomble N. E. Kh$te, Dlreator
Texoe Forest Servioe
Agrioultwel and Meohanioal College
Oollege Station, Texer
Dear 8lr: Opinion No. O-
We &ate reoelved nsldered the let-
ters you cent tis;-- ':irKiiGiiiii aubmfttod ae re-
queatlng the opinion of thl to whether a oounty
osll ‘la~~fullp expend or oont nd8 to aid the
Foreat Fire Fight olvlllan &etense
or&anleatlon, by of printin& aer-
tab aertlfloates ‘for suoh ~~rvloe.
thie State that the O~II+
miseloners* court orlty 88 Is expreeely
n It by the Constl’tution
find any oonstitutlonal or
authorize the commle~lonere~
ty fund6 far the purpose set
!
Opinion No. O-4074 oi,this department holds that 8
)ouaty ia not authorized to expend. oountf lulade to aid the
:lrr rationflyl and sugar rationing ti!ow* ;
.- 1
I.
j:\ 382
gonorable iv, Et’ White, Dire∨ Page’ 2
Under the authoritlee!olted in oplnlona Noa. O-l,529
and O-4074, it ie our opinion that
18 would be illegal for
eny oounty in ,Texaa tc ‘expend o6untf funda ror the purposea’ l
mentio ned ln rour lettrro.
!
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Combined Opinion