,. --
Honorable L. A. Woods ,‘~
State Superintendent of Public Instruction
Austin, Texas
Dear S,ir: Opinion No. O-4678
Re: Salary aid where entire dis-
trict is transferred by con-
tract under Rural Aid Bill
(Acts 1941, 47th Leg.,, R. S.,
Ch. 549, H.B. 284, p. 880)
We have received your letter of recent date, which we quote
in part as follows:
“Article 1, Section 1 of House Bill 284 provides
in part as follows:
“‘Districts maintaining a school at home and
having less than an average of one (I) enumerated
scholastic per square mile are exempt from said
minimum requirement and are eligible for aid for
only one teacher. . . .’
“Article 8, Section 1, which provides for the
transfer of an entire district by contract, provides
in part as follows:
“‘All of the funds of the district, including the
State aid to which the district would otherwise be en-
titled under the provisions of this Act, or such pro-
portionate part thereof as may be necessary, shall
be used in carrying out said agreement; . . . .’
“This question: If such district as referred
to in Article 1, Section 1 above is entitled to a salary
grant on one teacher if it operates a school at home,
would it not be entitled to the same amount of aid if
such district contracts to another district as provided
in Article 8, Section I?
- .
.
Honorable L. A. Woods, page 2, O-4678
84 3.
. . . .
Article I, Section 1 of House Bill 284 provides that the scholastic
provisions of the Act shall be distributed “in such a way as to assist all
school districts which have not fewer than twenty (20) nor more than five
hundredi(500) original enumerated scholastics. . . .” That part of Section
I quoted in your letter exempts districts maintaining a school at home and
having less than one enumerated scholastic per square mile from the mini-
mum requirement of twenty scholastics, and provides that such districts
are eligible for aid for one teacher.
Section 1 of Article VIII governs the transfer of the entire scholas-
tic enrollment of a school district which is unable to maintain a satisfac-
tory school. This transfer does not consist of individual transfers, but of
the entire scholastic enrollment as such. This provisions applies only to
transfers for the school year 1941-42. Said section reads as follows:
“Section 1. For the school year 1941-42 upon the agree-
ment of the Board of Trustees of the districts concerned or on
petition signed by a majority of the qualified voters of the dis-
trict and subject to the approval of the County Superintendent,
State Superintendent and Joint Legislative Advisory Committee,
the trustees of a district which may be unable to maintain a sat-
isfactory school may transfer its entire scholastic enrollment,
or any number of grades thereof, to a convenient school of higher
rank, and in such event, all of the funds of the district, including
the State Aid to which the district would otherwise be entitled s~-
der the provisions of this Act, or such proportionate part thereof
as may be necessary shall be used in carrying out said agree-
ment; provided that no aid shall be allowed for teachers that
are not actually employed in the contracting schools.”
You have informed us that some fifteen school districts in the sparsely
settled portions of Texas are affected by this question, that the teachers were
actually employed in the contracting schools, but that the districts have not
received salary aid, and that such aid is necessary to carry out the transfer
agreements. In other words, the receiving school has received and taught
the students composing the entire scholastic enrollment of the sending dis-
trict and has employwed the teacher for such scholastics; but the sending dis-
trict has received no salary aid, which it would turn over to the retieiving
school under the terms of the contract.
You wish to know whether you are authorized to pay salary aid to the
district under that part of Section 1 of Article VIII which provides that “all
Honorable L. A. Woods, page 3, O-4678
the funds of the district, includ~ing the State Aid which the district would
otherwise be entitled under the provisions of this Act, or such propor-
tionate part thereof as may be necessary shall be used in carrying out
said agreement.” (Emphasis ,ours)
This problem will not arise in transfers of entire scholastic
enrollment for school years after 1941-42, for under Section,2 of Arti-
cle VIII the scholastic census rolls will be combined, and the teacher-
pupil quota will be based upon the combined census total.
We are of the opinion that the school district is entitled to aid
under the Act. “Otherwise” is defined by Webster’s New International
Dictionary of the English Language, Unabridged (Second Edition, 1938),
as follows:
“1. In a different manner; in another way, or in
other ways; contrarily; . . ,
“2. In different circumstances; under other, or
any other conditions; . . . *
“3. In other respects; . . .
u . . . . .,
We believe that “otherwise,” as used in that part of Article VIII
which provides that ‘all the funds of the district, including the State Aid
would otherwise be entitled under the provisions of this Act,” simply
means the State aid which the district would be entitled if its scholastic
enrollment had not been transferred by contract.
Now, turning back to Section 1 of Article 1 we see that districts
maintaining a school at home and having less than an average of one
student per square mile are exempt from the minimum requirement and
are eligible for aid for one teacher. The scholastic enrollments of the
districts under consideration have been transferred by contract under
Section 1 of Article VIII. “Otherwise” they would come within the pur-
view of this provisions and would be entitled to aid “under the provisions
of this Act.”
It could possibly be argued that no one could know whether the
district would be ‘“maintaining” a school if the transfer had not been made.
Honorable L. A. Woods, page 4, O-4678
The purpose of Article VIII is to provide a means for educating pupils of
a district in which a satisfactory school cannot be maintained. We do not
believe that it was the legislative intent to penalize such school districts, ,
but on the other hand, to aid them in conformity with the caption of the
Act “providing for a more efficient public school system.”
In view of the foregoing you are respectfully advised that a school
district maintaining a school at home and having’less than an average of
one enumerated scholastic per square mile is exempt from the minimum
requirement of twenty scholastics and are eligible for aid for one teacher.
The entire scholastic enrollment of the districts under consideration have
been transferred by contract to another district under Section 1 of Article
VIII; it is our further opinion that such districts are entitled to the same
amount of aid for which they would have been eligible had the transfer not
been made, which aid shall be used in carrying out the transfer agreement.
Very truly yours
ATTORNEY GENERALOF TEXAS
Assistant
APPROVED JULY 6, 1942
APPROVED
OPINION
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS COMMITTEE
By-
Chairman
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Combined Opinion