. ...
._ -.
. . .. . ...*
OFFICE OF THE ATI-ORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
AUSTIN
ate4??y
paas\
;yughtitiavbg Uu. - -
T&eopllw&u@f the Cowtl of thlr Mate hue a&
beea unlfora upan the qwrtloa but the
lateatexpreul~ ti
vithal the roundeataenelushn, ve thhk, rerpeet
matter la rouad la Werleao v. Uhltnej,234 8. If.
? W) 1047,
oplnloa by Ju&e Sudley, adoptedbj the ihproaa Cmn’$ J&wiry
3, 1940. Intha oowae ofhla OpinionJudgo Wedby r&L&
*. . l sta a dwa tlme, h Qlmvw, umvk Ilo va
aad .wed, la that vhlch uaa srkblhhed u the
mnuaad4ItUdwdtlufweaohmnevuflxed
bamed o nth e
ma a ueo nwlea l
t& seo fI iip eo lflui
d0g r ~ or 2u4&t*.. ma 4 1h a a .b pets
x 4 awdin th 0
lo o a dr du,th ertm tme o f~vhlalio h n@ lr’
de8lg 4 a b ted
yth eut u united ~sta itu
ea ndwd
o e4 tr at!a
l c r ’
Ranarablc Bert Fwdr SW* 3
2oAurlunJurir adrrrar
The ao*t Judia&y 4 !ztk%
,:j.;:.
8whU opo~aaIl62~0$te~ ef ocJun,aotlc%$vh%nr%-
q&red by lav, fi2lngof appealbaado,rpPlfmtion8 fw writ8
,~f error,a&w undern pier, and the like.
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Combined Opinion