OFFICE OF THE ATI-ORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
AUSTIN
RonorableY. B. Qampboll
couhty AlaitQr
Xaaagdodms County
Xaoagdoohe8,Toxar
Dear sir:
Be1 cgdnionx0. C-3934
Tit10 to bridgeon
by
h I g h nalbya na o nea
-~~~~~~R QJtwa y
.
X0 aoknowle~e reootptof you]:IOtterof
Iloptrbmz 5, 194l, requONlWtho apinionat thfs
a0~0rhupon tho tolloringfaot nituationwhbh
im p0tea ha8 your lottort
*I mud like to knor if the old bribge
18 the property of the State Him Deput-
amit or waoogaoahesantlAngolinaCo\mtiea.w
-.
615
Honorablelb.B. Campbell - Page 2
The roiioning provision appears In Artlole
6674Q-9 Vornon*6 Revised Olril Statutes of Texas:
“. . . provided, howover, that nothing
in thla Aat shall prsvent the State Hlghusy
Comlaslon rran ohanglngor abandoningsny
We aasume from your stetamentor the mot sltuatlonthat
the bridge in question was oonstruotedjointly by.Angellne
and !?aoogdoohee Countlee on the river uhloh is the boundary
line between the two oountles. Under the above quoted
statutoryprovision the OomufsslonersOourts of Neoog-
doohea and Angellne Counties may eseume jurlsdlotlon
orer the bridge desorlbsd in your opinion remost, and
the bridge till then oouupy the s-0 status as any other
property belongingto the Countleaof Hactogdoohes and
Angellne.
Yours very truly
ROIFS
0.
APPROVED
OPlNlON
CoMMnTss
t+!E2$
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Combined Opinion