Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS -i AUSTIN Honorable A. A. Uiller ! ;., Oounty kttarney liewton County tmfton, Taxae opinion x0. 0-5686 Ro; lisherirrs - Board bills for prloooers. *our rfi~~tm for opinion upon the r0uorrfag stated fp38- tiont WGan tha eoPllsi8alonerm*aourt psy a board bill for the sherift when he only arreetb a prisoner a~@ does’~notplaaehlm in Jail?” has been rsaelved and oareI?ullToonsidsred by t&&o Department. The tsherirrof Nawton County, TOMI, 28 oonipetlaatod on a tea basirr. Artdole 1040, Vernon16 AnnotiatadTexss 006~sof Oriminal Proaedure,reads am follwmr CEor’tpe safe lceeplng,support and mxintenauae of prleonere contIne In Jail or under guard, the sherlrf shall be allowed the following ohargasr “1 For the safskebp or each prisoner ror etichdd the mutiof rittaen ceata, not to exceed the mm of two hundred dollars per month. “2. For support and malntenanoe,for each prieoner for eaoh day SW& a~ amount as my be fixed by the oormissfonerscourt, provided the same shall Bon. A. L Uller, page 8 be reascmbly Sui%Oient for such purpose, an6 in no event shall it be leas than forty aents pe:r day AO~ more than seventy-fiveceritsper day for eaoh prisoner. The net profits shell constitutereea of oifice ad shall be accounted for by the sherlfr in hie Wual report a8 other fees now provided by law. The eherltf shall in au& report furnish an Itemized verified eooount of all expenditurer mad8 by him for feeding and naintsnanaeof prisoners, aocompanyingsuch report wlth reoelptsaxxlvouohem in support 0r such item 0r expenditure,and the dlfferencebetween such expendituresand the amount allowed by the comadaafoner:scourt ahall be deemed to oonstltutothe net profite ror whloh eeib oftioor &all ao8ount a6 fees of oflice. *3. Bar neoercrary mediaal bill and reasonable extra oompeneatlon for attentloxito a prleoner during elokne5~;euah M mount am the ccmmls~lonerrr court of the county where tho prisoner is confinrd may detenelno to be Just and proper. %. For reasonable funeral oxptursw3 in Oaee of Qsath." The oases or Dall.+aCounty va. Re~nolda, 199 S. Vi.9011, aailiiarrisOountyVS. HamoM, 8021S. ii.%l, hold that the to the ahorlffior the board antioar8 ot par diem a.llowanco prisoner8is for eaoh day the prisoner is in Jail, rrgardless of whether he remins in Jail the whole of the bay and that if the.prisoner 18 kept in Jell for any substantial. portloh or the 5ny, the stierifiis entitl& to the full per diem allowanoe. ';requote fronthe oaae~of Dallas County VB. 30~0lU8, 199 5. 3, 703, at3 r0llowsr "11;is contendedby amelimt tit&tCo oon- &rue 6.'day'-&used in 6 statute to maan the t&e rmm riMnight to ti&l&t would, in many eases, work &A iAjU8tiO8. In reply it ti@t Justly be aaid that in meny ways it might work en fnjuatioa to the sherlft*toconstrUe the statits as oontended for by appellant. "It ~612~6thfiti~ the in6tluit Oaf30 the OcUnty auditor required thplte nsoord be kept ol'the rreotionalpart of t&e day, when only a part or a Boa. A. h. Xlllsr, page b day was oonsurnedin ke*ping a prisoner, in 8ome lnstsnoesto the hour, allewlng the sheriff only lB/B oants per hour. By thlr methdl It Eight arioo that it a prisoner wan reoalved ln the mornlq, say at 'Io’elook, and dlsoharged at 8 o'olook the aama day, arter two meals were ~Ivem, sna all the troubls engendered for reoelrlng, keeping, and blrahar&inghim, the eherltf would only receive about 18 oents, whloh would inm respeot begin to oompensatehim for hfs trouble In keeping, supportiq, ma maintaining him. r&en the contractwas made ror t&e pay of the rherlft ror auoh serrices there wan nothing said about a divlslon of a 4ayts time, ena our deoisi0~ holding tiiatwhen a day 18 so expreaeml It ir to be oonstruad to mean the tlma llaprlw between mld- dgbt ana midnight,we ~111 it0 00ntm-m it, lspeolally so when the oounty oomclssionershad the opportunity to llmlt it in tha oontraot with the sheriir ana fall.4 to do 60.” You 8t6te in yo+r letter that the a0f0ndsnf was arrorted b&i not plaoecl ln jail. We asmme from your letter #at the amd3d aa reloarad very 8000.after h$8 arrest, wa8 not plaoea "ua4er guard" ror any aubstantlallength of tlau and ww no tla-veb any meala by the tshulft. TJnbr the fa8ts atated and assumad,lt is our opinion that your que8tlon should be aaewsred ln the nsgatlve, and it 18 lo answered. Very truly JOUM ATTORW?&Y QENEBAI OT ‘MCXAS BY W8T:B NIL J. mIlnln& Asslutsnt APPROVEDJm 23, lg41 ATTORNEYGENSRAL OF TEXAS