Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

4’ . i 1 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS , AUSTIN “Art. 783. when the defondaot fs only finedthe judgzzent shall be that the State of Texarr mcovar of the defendant the amount oi euch fLne aca all OOBtiBDf the pmoeoatioa, and that t&e defendant., if pramnt, be coax&t- ted to jail until mob. fin6 and ootat8 are paid; or if the defsndant bo not PNiWAt, that a oaplae forthwith lrruo, aomuandlng the aher- lsf to arrest the defendant and 09381% him to jail until such fine and owtr are paidi al&?, that axeaution may isauo agplnat the proparty of such defendant for the amount Of tuch ffA@ and oostr. *Art. 904. If the pAAi#hmeAt iU aw other than a iiw, the jxu%pmt: hall rpa6ify tt, ana order it enforced by the wou0r'~rOeImA. xt sha,ll alro adjud5e the oamts &#&#a the ifzsm ~ and order tao oolUoflon theNof arr tit&r oaua8. defendant lo for a fine ai66hnr0tifrcmt the aamet "1, W&on ~th*mount theroof ba# bow fully paid. *I?. Uhen remlttod by the pxopet authdrltp. "3. Wh6~ he he8 ‘remaincld Ln ouetady for the time required by law to mstir~y the wnouut thereof. -Art. 789. When a juagguienthas baaa mn- dered againat a defendant for a peauul8ry flno, if ha is prwmnt, ha shtil be imprirone~ in jail until disohargad aa prcvldsd br -2.&w.‘.A asrtlfi~d copy of BU& fti@~ont Shall be 6tJffi- cient to authorize much imgrlaonm~nt. "Art. 988. wbsn a poouniary fine h+r born adjudged against a defendant not preiemt, e oapias shall forthwith ba i6ruad for hi8 arraat. ,. . .. 334 Honorable Wayne Lefwre, Page 9 The sheriff ahall arecute the cpameby plaa- ing the dsfendaat in jatl. “Art. 789. Where auah capias issues, it hall state the and aolouut of the ranaiti00 judgmimt and th0 amount -paid thereon, and oosmand the shariif to take tha defsndent and plaos hia in jail until tns asow& due upon euch judaent and ths furthor coet8 of col.Lectiq the aem6 are peid, or uutil the defendant is othelwise legally ditaohcrgedr *Art. 993. Whhma defendant ha8 b6ua oo3m;itted to jail fo default of the fina and @OUta adjudged airaituthim, the furthrr eu- ?orcsmat or 8UOh judgwnt ahall be in aoooz- danoe with ~the proolaionrr of this Code, wArt. 993, Wh6n a deisndant ie oonvi%ted of a ;I?iadenmanor ana hi8 puniahnent ir a8aa##- ed at a pecuniary fine, if he is unable to pay the fine and ooata adjudged agairst him, he may’for much time a8 till aclti8ft the fitagsunt be put to work in the wo~khowa, or on tha county farm, or publics laprovumut~~ of the county, aa provided in th6 auwaw4;LDg .wt$.- ela, or if thee be UC such ‘larkhouse, Cam or iaprovmmnta he &loll ba tfdphtsn@a in jail ~for a auff~oient lea&h of tiw to Us- ohergs the full amount of fine and bost.8 ad- judge6 against h&&; rating auoh Iabor or imprisonment at Three DOlLwa ($b.CO) for e&oh day thareoZ.* (lmdornooring onra) Artiale 794, V8rnon'a Annototsd 3imae Dade of orin- inal Procedure, read6 In part aa foLlowa.t *Art. 994. Whsrs the punlsbcasnt aasetsa- sd in a ocntiotion for aiademeanvr $8 acnii~- mnt in jail for mom than one day, or ahsrtr in euoh conviction the puclahaaot id aaaoltsed only et a peauniary fins and the Hrty 60 oon- doted is unable to pay the fine atnd costs adjudged againat hizc, those no codvictdd ahall Honorable Wayne Lofevre, Faga 4 be rsqulred to do mnual labor in aoaordaaoa .xith the provision8 OS thllr attiala under tha Soll~wlhg rules and regulstionsr n l . . .” Artiole 797, Vsrnon’s Annotated Tasaa Codr OS Crl&rml Procadure,~#+adr a8 Sollow8: wATt. 797. A deiehdant who hahasramalnad in jail the lsngth of tima required b:r ths jud&- mant shall be diecharged. %h8 ahetlrr haI.1 rdturn the aogy OS the judgment, or tha’oapiaa under whleh the defendant was imprfaoned,to the progar acurt, stating how it was exaaut~d.~ (Underaocrfog OUTS) We quota Sroln Amerfwan Juriagrudence, Vol. 14, pqb 70, am sollonea Vhare the statute requires that a judg- ment for aost8 be renderad against the ddbn- &ant on conviction, It seems thet no other ju&g~snt may be properly sntsmd by the aourt4 an6 it has been held that thr court ntay amen4 a jUb@Wlt Or QOitVi@tiCIn ILull PTO t?JJiS, btbB art&r the close of the tarak, 80 as tc charge tha QoSamIant with aaeta a6 raquirad by stat- utm.” (citing the oascl 0r vU.linas Y. atate, 106 Ark. 471 151 3. W.~lWrJ, 43 I. R. A. (X. 3.) 3cw.f ivet quote rrfm 12 Taxao Jurlapruaenob, gaga 715- “1 353 - Nuna Pro Tuna Zntry - In Cbosml =*ir there is a raiiuva Smm any oauiub whatever to sntar juament and pronoun0a aen- tenoa during tha term, the judgmsat my be entered and mntsmoe pronounaed at any suedeed- ing term OS the ooUrt, unless a sew trial baa bash granted, or the judgment arrerted, Or an appeal ha6 been talcad.’ (Mt. 778, V.AS.0.P.) (Brackets oure.) 336 HOnOTable Wayne Lerevre, mge 8 The oourt also has yuwar lndepeadaat or the statute to ent*,r jud$mat aua~ pro tuna. “. . . . The sat applies end permit8 the entry OS h nun0 pro tuna juclggmat in c6i381) fihere the judment 88 orlglaally entered 00~s nc~t iE fact axi~sas the ju&neat renderrd . . . 7Uadoreaoriag oura. ) *I 333 - *besdura - zsreat "To warrant the entry of a judgment or sentence nuaa pro tuac then must ba proor that the gro?ossd judgmat or aeateaoe was thoretoiore actually readmod or pronounesdI but thin proof may be made a8 well by par01 a8 by reaord evidbacr. Wotiae OS the pro,porddbatlg iaue~ be gioba to the aoaueed; aab in a rbiony oaso he muat be fPrssent wkeiedfhr entry ir made. . * l . " It WC&tt;a duty OS the oouaty judaa to adjudge .tbq oosts,agai;lst the, deiendmat in tha mQttsr inwired about! ,'hbkersr, this gx~isiaa wab apparwatlp Of#itted Srom the jud&imat inadvertently. Revertheless the shsriri who is required to execute the judgmat muit look to the provi- mlona oS the judgment lind be guided thereby. The judmat oauld elearls be corrected b a mm0 pm2 tuna #atry upon proper motion anb proper not 31 ae. W’s thick the proper proaeduro IA thie twitter would be to oorrsct the jud@a;nmtOUM pro tuna by proper prooaedfnas so as to add the prmiolon iu .the judgmerst ad- juagi43 obete np#Iinst the dsfendaat . unt.i1this atIn Dro tunp :udginaat WUIIectarad the bherlSS woul.d have no authority to hold ths de?eadant far 008t8* Vary truly your8 APPROVEDMAR..28,- W&f ATTORWYWESiii4L 0.8' TiCXAS f3Lculrw ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS : -* wJ-l!:sc 'BBCLOSURE