Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

TEEA~RNEY GENERAL OFTEXAS Bmorahlr Y. 0. FlonwrB Eeoretary g? sbte havia couilty chuan, lwaB Dear Sir: Attention ofwillMiumRichardson opinion Ilo.O-2452 Ro: Requirementas to loo&ion of prinoipnl plaoe of -3lxlfaea~ of * oorporation. nisd11 a~owledgo receipt of your letter of June 6,19cO, in rhioh pu request the opinion af this depnrtaxmtupon the quueationthereln prssented. Tb0 pertinent parts of your letter are: ?requent~y corporationsthat hare given their prinaipnl plaoe of lus~os8 in one tom ohmge their ptinoipal pbae of business to another M, ad 1~ au& oaeee we require that the charter be amended ahow- ing that obmge. "!% hare an instxnoo,howcvor, ia nhioh a charitableand benevolent corporationhas this provision in it.6oharterr "*The general chapter of this order is to ba located and ha= its ptincipl office at Fort !Yorth,Tarrant County, Texas, with mob rutmrdinataohaptcra owr the State of Toxas arnithinthe judgroat and under tie by-lava of this corporationit may be ax- pcdient to orga2ito.'". You correot the last parapph above quoted 1;;your letter of June 10, 1940, in which you adviser "lhe crecretaryand the head of the oorporationdo not live in sort Worth, bnt the annual three day conventionof the oorporationis held ic Fort Worth, where all records are kept. All o$ the business of the oorporetionis dote at that time. 3% secretary does oary OP oorrespondenoefrom enother olty. however." you desire to Lno~rhether or not, under the oircunstanoeemationed, th,, oorpontion muld be required to file IUIamendmentto ita eatier. -- %nombls Y.O.Floweis. Page 2 o-245:: xtiole 1204 of the Rdvissd Civil Statutss enmsrates the inromtiol: ,&ioh :austbe contained in a uharterof a privste oorporatia. pmg such rs- quiremnts is fouod 6e+lon 2 thereof -rrfic!r reads: "The plaoe or plaoes vhiero its iUSiW3C~ is to b trasmcted.fl The quotaticn from your letter of June 6, 1840, ;'?rsinabors taken from the charter fulfills this requirement. It was held is the osse of Sanders vs. Yarmsrs' 6tnte paiar226 m 626, that the residsnosof a oorporatiol: is In ths stats and oo~~ere its prinoipal office is located. ws prir.oipls of law wau lw-afi&.d :" the oa*e of PittshrgWater WetiterCompanyVS. ~ullivao, 262 K576,. f\oareful exaMoatlo~kof the Yexas 3~3.utos rsvoals no reqtilrsnent that'*e offioers of a corporationEust reside ir!the city wherS the principal pla& of tusiness of the oorporatior. 5,s. Under the faots presented to us, we carnot hold, as a matter of lax, that the faot that the searetsry of tho oorporatiorIn question lives in a oity other than the oity of tho priwzipalplace of buciness of such corporationis suffioisntto require sn ansndr53ottoths oorporate charter. APPRO'LiiJW:. 27, 1940 Gerald C. MIX Attorney General of %x&s U:aW:Sll