Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

FILErdc .. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN Eoaonbh wlllirn 8. Davir ,. i 'i, oounty Attoraey \ mmmlt oounty /r----4 I rnon’a motat- reoeipt oi your letter opinion of thlrraepmt- outIonuIll lie againat a busfness ortablish- public, preparing ana 8eouro a health oar- the mmef or rho for lafebtio~us Ah&o&d 7050, Veruon*a hanotatoa Ponal Oode, r0uw6 I "8eetion 1. 80 pernon, firm, oorpora- tion, oomaon earriw or l8aooIatIoa o-rat- Ina, 0aargIng or ooaduotIn(lany hotel or any other pubilo rleeplng or eating plaoo, or say plaoe or vehio&e rhww food or drink or oontalners therefor, of any kind, I8 aan- uraoturoa, transferred, prepmod, #to-a, Honorablo Wm. H. Darf8, Fagr e _. paoked, rorved, sold, or othrrwire handled in thl8 State, or any manufaotursr or vendor of oandlar or manufaoturea awe&a, shall work, employ, or keep I5 their un lop, in, on, or about any 8aId plaO6 or rehlp010, or hare de- livered any artiols therefrom, any prreon In- footed with any traneml8alble oondltlon of aay inteotiour or oontaglour dleeasa, or wOrk, or employ any person to work in, on, or about any said ~laoo, or to delirrr aay artlole thexwrrom, who, at the tf.me0r hi8 or her am- ploymeat, railed to drlivor to the employer or hi8 agent, a OsrtIfIcatr rignod by a legally lloaared physloiaa, residing In tha oounty where said person I8 to be employed, or-is am- ployrd, attesting the faot that thr bearer had bern aotually and thoroughly examInad by euoh phy8IoIan within a week prior to the tima or suoh employment, and that ruoh examination din- oloaed ths taot that suoh perooa to ba employed was irae from lay transmisrible oondltlon or aay InfrotIou8 or oontagloar aissaasl or rail to Inrrtltuteand hare made, at lntenalr of tIms not lxooeding 81x montha, aotual and thorough lxamInatlon8, lseentlal to the tlnd- I588 0r frredom rrom ooamunloablo and inr00tiou8 dfaaaesa, oi all rooh employees, by a legally lloonrad physloiaa rsrldlng in the county where said person I8 employed, and imoura In lvI&enoe th6r00r a oartiiloate 8ignOa by 8uoh physiolan 8tatIag that suoh examlnatlons had been made or auoh person, dlroloslng the raot that ha or rho was ire0 frcxnany tranamlrslble oondltlon of any ooamunloablr and intaotfous disearrer. “900. 3. All health osrtlrloates calha ror by thlr hot rhall bo dfspiay6a ror pub110 fnspeotion at tha plaoe whrra the person named thereon Is employed, and rhall not br remOTad rrom lruohplaoe during the oontlnuanoe of ruoh empl0mnt axoapt by a publio health orriosr, hiteuly appointed agent, or upon valid oourt . . ." -soo. 4. The iallure 0r any pmson, rim, oorporation, oommon oairler or aasoolatlon engaged 1.39 HollorableWm. E. Da?Is, Page 8 .. In any or the bu81508808 de8oribed in this hot, to display et the plaoe whore aay of tho op6ratIonr or 8uOh bUSi lro king ooa- duoted, a valid health or regIOt?atlon qettlil- oat*, as requiroa by this Aot, ror la o hperson employ& In, on, or about ruoh plaoe, 8h811 be. prima taoio rriaeaoe that the Said porsoa, rirm, oorporatlon, oommoa oarrlrr or l88oolatIoa in +iolatloa or requIre0i3at86aliea ror by this Aot, raflmd to requlrr thr lxhlbltloa or the pro~em- ploymat health oOrtirioate, or ruoh per*oa ma failed to lnstltute and hav8 made or ruoh pm- soa, aotual and thorough lamiaatloru n6oosrary to the ?i5di48 0r rn6a08 rror omunlaablo ai8earsr at intervals 0r time not rxo*edi.ng 8%X months. '500. 5. whoever riolatir any prorlrioa O? this Aot Sh11 bO tinOd In On -0-t IU)t lX- oeedIn# ho Hundred DOllara ($800). mob aot or OtiSSiOn in rlolatlon 0r any 0r the prori- SIOIU of thIO Artlole, shall oonrtitute a rsparate offenre end shall by yI5ishabl. a8 hereInaboro pnsorlbOd.* As w6 polntOd out In 0pInIon O-16851 *It I8 plala to see that thin lot makes It unlawful, rlr8t ror proprietor6to work or aaploy employees with Intootlow or oontaglour dissasr) sooond, ror proprlatorr to work employ- 808 wha aid not hand over to SuOh lmployOr8 mid health oOrtlrIoatr8; third, ror proprio- tars railing to requlN physloal lxaalnatlotm or lmployOe8; tourth, ror manufaoturerr or TOa- dors 0r aaadio8 or maauiaaturad suwts to 8011 to persons who do not hatO ralld health Oertifl- oatw, or who do aot hare display oeaes a8 re- qulrmd by lawy rlfth, ior proprietors iOllIn@ t0 display,oert lrioatos.* fnthat opialon we lXpM88Oa SMe doubt as to whetha or not ArtIolO 9050, or the PenOl 0oae, ~&es It an offense for proprletorr to work with Infeotlour or OOB- ta lOUS ai860s6, or for railurr to hare a a lxaalnatlon m % l by a physlolan or for failure to airplay their own health oOrtlflOate. TO&U rOqUe8t 4008 5Ot rai8@ tbm CWStiOn 3.40 Ho5orable wa. 8. mVi8, Rge 4 .. 0r whether or not it Is made a5 OfreaSO ror proprIetora to work with Inieotlour or oontagiou8 dlsaasa, and thare- roro we shall oonriae this 0 lalon to the quastioa or whother or not It 18 ualawtup uuder Artlola, o? tha Panal 0046 ror a proprietor to work without harlng axam- Inatloa made by a phy8Iolan or ror a proprietor to rail to display hIr owa health oertlrloate. ArtIOlaS 1, 3, ana 6 0r the mm1 ooae 0r thI8 State provide t "Artlola 1. Th6 aOSi&S OflM Otin( ; thio aoa0 la to dot150 In lain lan(lua&e lTery oftea8e a&al&W the Plws oi this~ State, and lf?Ixto each offense Ite $ropor poniShI&O#lt ." ~Artlole b. In or&or that the systu or palrullaw la roroa in this Stat6 lpay be oom- plot0 within it86ir, and that 50 ryatan or rore@i laws, written or unwritten, may ba ap- pealed to, lt 18 doolarod that no poraon shall k puaI8hea for any aot or oml88Ioa, unlrss tha SaDLO18 made a'penal ofren88, and a penal- t&Irsg;sod tharrto by the written law of .- lArtlole 6. Wh6nrv6r It appsan that a pSOYiSiO5 0t the panal lw I# SO inaerl5itely framed or o? uuoh doubtrul oon8truotLoa that it oaa aot be wd6rStOod, either iron the langwgo la whloh It 18 l XpMSllOa, or r r c m some othar written law or the state, suoh ;;;;l law shall be rogarad as wholly Inopora- .a fn keeping with thaOa Artloler It 18 thm law or this State that a panal enaotment must a6rin0 with o*rtainty th6 lo t o r o mIs8lo aaenouaoed a8 an o r t6a 8e. Sx part0Lealle, 69 Tax. or. Rep. 496; tea S.W. lle9l tr parte wllmuth, X85 Tax. Or. Rep. a941 69 S.W. (Ed) @891 Clnabr ‘I. State, 100 Ter. Or. l&p. 149, 800 8. 91. 44 warm; v. 8tate, 118 Tar. Cr. Rp. 351, 48 8. W. (34 515, . * 141 Hoaorablo Wm.8. mris, Pagr 5 _. We do not bsllevs ths statute suffloisatl~ da- aounoss the aot or omlsslon or tha lmployar in raIlin& to obtain a phploal examlaatlon of his owa prsoa or In falling to 6lsplsy Us own hsalth osrtirloats so as to onats aa orreaee 58 to him. Moora0 rr bb1iet8, as w ahall later DOllIt out, that suoh was the lntsat.of tha k6iSl8tUSO. In Murray v. stat., 51 Tsx. App. 550, a 8. w. 757, 57 Am, Rap. 683, an lnformatloa against ths derena- ant oharged him with vlolatlag Artlole 685 of tha psaal Code or 1585 ror wiiruri~ and nlsohlerousl~ lafurla5 a looolnotireengine. i3aldArtlole 555, however, related to the Qastruotion or, or iajurlasdone to, .?grow~ fmlt, oora, grain, or other l(rloultura1 pwduots or property, real OS persoaal+) ad the oonrt held the fa- r0mti0n in8urri0iwto oharge an orreasa. fn this oonneotlon the court quoted with approval the rollswin# language of ILr. Dillon in the ease of U. 8. 78. Qlaytoar “8 ...For these rsasona, whose oogsnor is obvious, the law 18 settled that, in ooa- atruing ltatutss, the language used is sever t0 b0 lOat Sight Or, 8na tb8 pIWStU@tiOKi i8 that the language la used in no 8xtmWllna~ sense, but in Its oommon, l rerpl@T msaning. whan oourta, in oonstruin~ statutea, depart rrom the language emplaTs bv ths lsglslator, they hour the risk of mlstakIag the lsglsla- tire will, or bsolarlng it to exist where, in truth, it has nef6r had an sspresslon, The legltl0ate runotlon 0r oourts is to inte ths leglalatlre will, not ts supplemen -&p or to supplr it. The jUdiOi8I’ y mUSt lieit themselres to expoundlag the lawi they OaIUIOt ppake it. It bslonga only to the leglslatirr department to oreats orlmea and ordain punlah- mats. Aooordingly, oourts, in the OOnStrUO- tion or statutablo offsnses, hs.n always ragarded it as their plain duty oautlousl~ to keep olearly within the expressed will of tha legis- lature, lest otherwise they shall hold aa rot or omlsslon to be a orlam, and punish It, when 1.42. Eonorable Wm. 8. Derls, Page 6 _. g faot the lsglslatue had aevsr lo Intended w this rule is rlolatea*, says uhief Jukoe BEST, %h e fa teo r th e lo o ua eap er so n la 4eolded br the arbitrary dlsorstlon of the judges, and no t by th eexprsss lathorlty of the lava.* Ths prlnslple that the Xaglslati+e la- tent is to be found, if posalble, la the enaat- meat ltaelf, mad that the statutes are not to ti lxtsndod by oonatruotlon to oases not falrlr aailolearlr lmbraoed in ttmlr terms, is one or grut lmportanos to the oltlzaa. Tha ookqts hate no Rover to Oreate Ofreneea, but lr,.bf a latltudlnarian oonstruotioa, they oonstrus oassa not provided for to ba within the lsgls- la tir lenaotmaats, it is manlrast that the earety and llbsrty of the oitlzea ara put in peril, and that the lsglalatlts d-la has bsen irmadeb. or oourse, aa snaotaant is aot to ba rrittared avay by forord oonstruotlons, by utaphysioal aloeties, or mere rsrbal and sharp oritloisms. Nerertheloss the dootrlne la fundamental 5.8IEq- llah and marloan law that there oan bs ao ooa- struotlre orfenaes; that, before a man oaa bo punlahed, his oa8a Bust be plainly and unalstakably within tha statute, and, ii then bo any fair doubt whether the statute lmbraoea it. that doubt %a to be reaoltsd $n favor of the looused . l .*a In wtlxlo v. stats, ciao Tex. Cr. mp. 55a, 47 s. w, (ad) 847, it was held that a St@tUt# penalislnd rld- lng on a "train or street oar or interurban oar* ln ooaoh or oompartmunt mob 4ealgnatedior ens*s 2800 was inapplloa- ble to one r’iblagin a *bus* operated by a street railway We believe lt equally Olear that an aat aimed 8t gi%r& an l~loymr to se@ that his employves hare health oertlfloatea aad are regularly sxasiinsddoes not apply to oompsl the employer hlaself to subait to saoh examination or dieplay his ova health aertlfloate In the abernoe of language raqulrlnd that this be done. Ths intent of the Le~;slaturo is of par4aouatin- portanoo in ooastrulog a atatute,and ths oonolosloa nashed in the praosdlng paragraph la @tr#ngth#nad by lookind to the 143 .. Eonorabls Wm. II.Darls, Psge 7 emereeaoy olause of Howe 5111 142, Aots 1939, 46th Lsgis- lature, Oh. 6, p. 551. T h isis a na menda to lnaotmeat, ry but saoh mot or the Laglslatura slnoo 1991 4eall with ths sairasubject amtter has had tha sams or a a I3 lar emerpnoy olause. 688 8eO. 7, Asts 1991, 57th Leg., Ch, 66, p. 154; 880. 4, Aots 1957, 45th Leg. oh. 559, 9. 707. This olauae rea4s in part as follows~ m0. a. mergenay clru5r. .ma raot that aant rood and drink lstabllstieata en4 hotorles are not required under thm present tar to h a tetneirlwlo r ea examined s or seo ur e ssrtlrioates. , .* (Vn4erseoring oura) h e a lth to a proprietor or a rood and drink lstabUshmant for hhs failure of suoh proprietor tc have an examination of his per- son made by a phploian ror the purpose 0r determining freedom from lnfsotlous or sosmunloable 4lssase or ror fallura to dls- play his own health osrtlflsate In him latabllshasnt. very truly yours ATTOl?NiY CBNXRAL OI TEXAS ;PFBOVECJUN 15, -1940