Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE A’ITORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN DearNr. Jams4 you requeot the not araaoa iflver Befuading Borden tory &au, au co ier of Btate fun&a. FJU Treat- 1 reqdre eueh bmk 80 de&g- Qu8li.Q 98 h w&d r.MpoSlW~ before the with flay of #oveuber Iby (a) &qoelting a depository aignea lay some surety oonlpaq authorieed~to Bo bud.nes~ la Bmau, in an asmmt equal to not lee9 than &n&lb the amount of &Rate fuxle al- lotted, em!& bond to be parYobl0to the freaaurerunfito be in ma& Porn au rubybirpoorribed by the Board end 877 lttbea tto'the~apprmalof mmhBoard; tb )by pled@agtiththe beasumr Ey seouritles OS the following klndet Bonds and cer@floetee and -other ti- demo08 of indebtbdtm88 of. the United 6tstos, sad all other box&s -oh are @laranteed as to both @nQipal and in- terest by the Unfted Stster ; boodeof thl6 state b0xls ad other obligations lesped by the Uxtivet-olty of Text&s,ear- mute dravn on tho State Trsam agalast the General Ro~snue of the St&et bond6 issued by the Federal.Farm Ucwtgage Cor- por-atitm~orlded both pri.noip~%l and in- terest of sold ‘bonds are &g&ta.ufeo8 by the United Btat&Govermmnt$ BorneOwn- em Loam Corporatioa Bonds, ,protied both pslmiprrl and interest~ot mid boqU8 we @aranteedbytheUnitod StatesGovern- tmnt and 8uoh osburitles 8hdl be acoept- ed~theBoanLin,aa,~tnotlessthan~ five (a) r cent greaterthsathe 8umm* d State ru&s which they 8sm.u-e~w&d, that Texas &Wiof mrds uay.be ~nccrOpted at ffme value atxlnlthont~mrr@.n ior the t6amtttttSBtste fwm%s allotteU, Ffo+ide~I, atteh State Relief Bond8 hare all rniEIkpsd 00upoM tittaeaed bonds of 0ounflelB 1oQated In Texaas; roud d Lt tr*ot8 oi aounttett,in TeJIps j inaepetatentsad comma *c&o01 die- triCtslosstediIi~sxas) ana'bondeZe8usd by tinntcL* oorporatlons b Tow; ~* + lm Ccm8ematlon aul'k&sat~o.on bietrlots are pm110 OOt'QO~8tiOM OuthOrieed outaFt3@Utad w Chapter 8 Of Title la of the llerisedCivil Stututeo. Braxott Bi+er Ceneervo- tion and Real~tion Distriot *as ersated by eat of the Clst 'beglslature, 8octd called seesion, -specialUivs, page 22, Chapter 13. The Aathasbeenssmmaltimec amended, the last one be%ng tliatof lQ3!S,44th Legislature, first called SOPSIO~, page 1627r Cht3pter868. Artlele 2628 o? the ctatuteo de-8 tie olasses of eligible beouritieo ior public depositories. 'If the bonds arler oon8iderat3anare tobe condder ed elle;ibl+ %t xttst'ba~bemu8e taey belong ta thd alask llsrmsd by .mrrmigi- pal corprstlons,~ for, clearly, they do not fall within auy other olass~ezamertatedby the statute. Bozloreble Jooee Jame - paF;o 3 The torm*mn%uipal eorporafitm~ Is osmlln fro differentsenses in otettttee md in detcbions, adl, lllmvias, in comlon lance of tiaeneiel circles. Pirst, it is ueod ea eynollymua aith publzc oorporlrtions au aontra-dlstinguiehod fram prltntocor- etiom, esl in thet eonee it would lnclnde State r OXiS, COUttt~ bO?ldB, Oity bOlit8, SChOObdthtdCt bonds, saqmYenr3ntdstriot bonds, and pgp other bog2 Issued bJooergordioIlServiago eoeote pleao, the torn rover aud tmro speol.fic twauseat3roferrizg to oitios, tovM aud vllleg0s only. billon on Uaniclpel Corporations (6th editbn) sajrst •Uuni.c~paloorporetians am2 in&i- tutlonttdeuigned for the looal gmern- taantof towns a& cities; or, mre ec- eumtel.y townsand aitieo dth their Sult&iteutsare for pwpo600 of iiubordi- nete local a&idnkstrotian ismeet@ 01th a oorpor~te &ereeter.~ (vol. 1 rsw .ls). A&n, the sspc authorltydaclarost cuillltp, 00 vcll OS oity, ICIa gubllc cor- porstiOll; bat th0 Bob001 diStriCti Or county, jroporly epeuking, is not, while the city is, a gunicivo~ corporation. All rslnicipal~corporatfons.ere gxttalio b0dief3, oraetod for cirL1 or political purpeee~ but all aivil, political, or p&lie cor- .I379 Honor8blo J0s8s Jams - page 4 contenmletlon of this treatise. has roferenoe s- to lncorooreted wi touns, and cities, rlth potter of lo- CC1 adlli338~tl. 88 diOtiMUfShOd from other public iorpmatic& auah as oouuties cud guesi oorporet~oua.~ (6348 P* 452) To the sme general effoot are the following stcmderd srlterer Fletcher on Corporetious, YO 1, sf!67 to 66; Thompson on Corporotio 8, vol. 1, ifiM-26; lWuillian hunicipal Corporation8, ii% 133-13y. In Opinion X0. o-U52, applying thoeo priuei- ples end construiug Article 2629, se held that the r&tnd- ing bot8l.sof a w seter-lmprwosmt district were not sllglblo es muicipal bonds. That opinion 8hould be fol- loood not only upon Lpecedent but upon sound reasonlugas roll. It hae boen suggested that tho mordlug of the statutes creating the Brasos airer Consenatiw and Reole- mation District is such en to constitute the district a suudcipslity sit&W the euaning of Artiole 2S29, the par- ticular lenguege rsfsrrsd to being es 2ollosat *she BraSOB River ConaerYatlou axl Reclamation dietriet ie oreatedan a gwenmrsntel agomy, a pmicipelitp, body politlo end corporate, rested tifb all the eutbority as an& under the Consti- tution aad leas of this State.. (B 2 of tho original Act). We outmot adopt this suggestion. Tho rord lsunloipalit~ $31Seotion 2 is usod In the general all- coszprehonsiresanse of public corporations, as oontrn- dfBtiUgUb%hea fmtu private Corporation. In this sense the word is apt and it is In thin sense the I4egislattme Used It3 ObYiOUSl~, the LegislatUre did riot use the TOrd Qunicipality~ in its smo speclfio sense -- that of city, town or Yillage - for the consorYation and reclaxatlon district was not at the time and cannot be, arrlsas nwer ihteuded by the Act to be, a olty, tow or rlllage. Wreovec, the faat that Article 2620, occordiug to the latest smmdment thereof'(1039) In enumBretfug the Honorable Jesse Jams - pace 5 olasses of securities &a eligible named lr o sil diStriot6,' s&ndepsxIont axl oomxm school dietristan, a talrmniclpal corpr;Ltlons,* thus iadicsted lndiaplteblg that smnmicipl corporations9 as a alas6 was used in the epacoifio ssnse of cities, tow mcl rillagcs, rather than in its uxmt gener- al 68063 -- that of publio COrpOrRtiOM -- for rood din- triots and COEWP school distriots and independent school districts are publia corporations, and in the broadest' sense nunLeipa1 corporations , so that their enumratlon tould hmo bean use1086 if lnunAcipalitieew Included thoui. If tho Loglslature had intended that consanatlon and reclamation district bonds should bs eligible, undor Article 262~~ it oould easily have included them in its amx&mntOP1939. We therefore hold that the refumling bonds of Brazes River Conservation and BecloEation districta are not sligible as eoouritiss SOr public depoetteries, under Article 2620 of the Revised CiHl Stat&es. Very tmly yours ATTORWEiXGEBEULOFT~ t &G wie ABSi6ee ls OS-UR APPROVEDAPR25, 1940 /izkL&u*w ATTORNEYGENERALOF TEXAS