Legal Research AI

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Court: Texas Attorney General Reports
Date filed: 1940-07-02
Citations:
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Combined Opinion
   OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL    OF TEXAS
                     AUSTIN




itonorab1eliarryKnox
Chairman, State Board of Control
Auatin, Texas
Dear 81rr




        xour Lnqulry                   calle ior the
aonstructlonof a carts              ered Into by the




                            of t.aklngall of the dead
                             to his undert~     parlor
                             thereaPtQr$8 able in many
                   o those relatives and t%lends who s
                   mceeeary funoral equipwnt. k oopp
                   ormpatiesyour letter and hae bean
               dored by this department.
         The foaturcs xmtioned abovo era deened euffl-
0iQnt explanationor the oon+ract to s&e iniiellfgent
our answer to your i.rqxtrles.The first qwetion yen
         1st *Doea the State,Board Or CQ&iEo~ have
$3ropoIlnd
author&t7 to enter Into such a contract?* Is thw
the question should be answered Sn the af%rmatlve.
We oan find nothing illegal about th% same. It is oer-
tainly the duty of the State to Be% that the body of an
innrt% of the inetitut10nis removed to BOlw undC3rtakimg
parlor as 80031as possible after life haa ended It is
~lkovise the duty of the State thFou@ the ouperintemi-
ent of the institutionto notify the relatives OS mmh
inmate~sdeathamiuhew      thebodyxqbefound.      Inour
o-on,    no relative would sane OF ba ullllng for the
body to rem&n in the institutionor +thout ear@ dur-
ing ~hoti~~~~hiChw~llldberequiredin~loot Ztmtancres
for thmz to ooF1sto Au&in aixlmake the neoesaaryar-
raugyzwte. Ii? the und8rtaker upon t&sir arrival  In
dustin Eokes a trad8 with thmior the nmmmary ca5kfA
and other articles for the funeral, that is no eoucern
of the State) a@ tf M tiertaker i.eoilXS.nSto give a
decent burial to those inmtos, the expense of wh&uh
aould otberwlsebe upon the State &st for the @v&-
lege of camying all dmeaaed patLta to tie umlertak2mg
mlor, with t&e hope of eellina;relatlvee the nemsmry
articles for the funeral, we CIulsea nothing ill0gal aeat
the lnki%rt*,    but the whole x!attw  oolqwts~to That we
belbY% to be in ~freepltagwith the pwper ear% sad reep%at
the interested psrties are duetbedecossad patient.
         Tour tse8ondqueixtlon&:    lP Wa eea dvisft
                                                   e
this cox&raatehouZdbeletmabjeotto      thereqafceaenfe~
oi~tlaleo63(a,6~,6(e1~3srd,~            of thshv~md
GiYil ststut%eOS ia6.*     An -tion       e themeArti-
cles dbbaloeedlthat they govern the parahase of oupp2feo
by the State,and In our opiniouuou~duotbe     6pplioabl.e
In the 1ettlng Of a Gontraetll.ketw~.uileFepo pllrahsse
of euppliee in solved.
              Xou 833-e
                      further advised that it is our opjsion,
in the abeem ofthis contraat with thexmdmtaker,that
the d%ath of one of the inantes of one of the eleamosy-
nary institutions      vould authors th% stats Board of aon-
trol to -12~3         the neee      fnnalw supplies, in auaora-
ante with Art.5cle660 of t&8 Tieed statu*.
                                     vary wulg pair%
                              AZ?EORR2XCt!RWUL OF‘TSXAS


                                                             /JpPROV

       ATTORNEY   GENWAL   OF TX::