Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Honorable George H. Sheppard Comptroller of Public Accounts Austin, Texas Dear Sir: Opinion No. O-2008 Re: Where one person operates a store and another person owns title to the merchandise in the store, the operator is liable for the chain store tax. This is in answer to your letter which reads as follows: “There are a number of concerns, foreign and domestic, operating in Texas, that consign merchan- dise to warehouses and retafl stores to be sold at wholesale and retail in the State of Texas. This merchandise is on consignment only when sales are made. The store aperator or warehouse operator .~ receives a comm ission from the sale of such mer- chandise; the ownership of the merchandise is re- tained by the consignor, and he places the price on the merchandise that the consignee sells. ‘Does the ‘store tax’ apply to the actual owner of the merchandise or to the operator of the ware- house 7 * We assume that there is no contract between the operator of the warehouse and the owner of the merchandise whereby the owner of the merchandise has any control over the warehouse, that the owner of the merchandise does not own an interest in the warehouse or exercise any control over it, and that his only connection with it is that h.e retains title to the merchandise in the warehouse until said merchandise is sold. The ‘Chain Store Tax Law” of Texas is House Bill No. 18, Chap- ter 400, First Called Session, 44th Legislature, Acts 1935 (codified as Article 111 Id of Vernon’s Annotated Penal Code). It provides that cer- tain prescribed license fees, which are in fact taxes, shall be paid for the privilege of operaffng a store. and reads in part as follows: Honorable George H. Sheppard, Page 2 (Opinion No. O-2008) ‘Sec. 2. Any person, agent, receiver, trustee, firm;> ‘. corporation, association or copartnership d.esiring to ,. operate, maintain, open or establish a store or mercan- tile establishment in this State shall appIy to the Comp- troller of Public Accounts for a license so to do. . . .” “Sec. 5. E,very person, agent, receiver, trustee, firm, corporation, association or copartnership opening, estab- ~. lishing, operating or mainfaining oneor more stores Or .~ ~ mercantile establishments within this State, under the same general management, or ,ow+rship, shall pay the license fees her&after .i ~,.~.i prescribad for the privilege of dpniqgl e~stablisliing; operatingor maintaining such ,‘#orc$k~o.r’Lercaiitile establishments . . .* ii ) ,‘I i”.” ” ,.) .,._ ” ‘“tie&; ‘I;’ ,yl& teim”sto&~ as used in this Act shall be construed tome& and include any store or s,tores or any mercs+lq establishment or establishments not specifi- cally exempted’within &is Act, which are owned, operated, maintained, or contrqll,ed by the same person, agent, re- ceiver, trustee, firm, $or~poratiP11,copartnership or associationli either ~. domestic ‘or fereign, in whL& goods i wares or mkei~ch+iise &.a~$ kiad~ax+&s?ld; At retail ore‘. wholesale. .’ This is I& b ‘&x &. ‘hi&@& nor On thi msr&umdise nor on the gale of the merchandise, b,ut it ‘is a t&c C&the privilege of aperatillg the store. In the cas.e of HI& v. Gooper.~13O~Tex. 433, 110 S. W. 2nd 896, the Supreme Court of Texas .sai’& U . . . we experie- PO difficulty in reaching the conclusion that the so-,+&d license fees levied thereby are primarily occkqktibn ‘$&c&S.~ . . Sectiqn 5 of the ~CJpjrin.S$we~Tax Law* says that Pevery person (etc.) . .. ~+. opening, o,stablishingl, ope,r+fing or,maintaining one or more stores . . . sill. pay the ,Iicen+e fee,9 . , . prescrmed for the privikge of opening, establis~ng, operating or maintaining such stores.* The fact that a person owns all of,,the merchandise, or a part thereof, in a ‘store wouId be an eIemant~of,considera~? in determing whether or not the owner of such merchandise was operating or maintaining said ‘store; but that fact alone, does n$ jus,tify, a.holding that, the owner of the mer- chandiseis .engaged,in *opening, .istsb~ishing, dpdrating or maintaining” / - - . - Honorable George H. Sheppard, Page 3 (Opinion No. O-2008) said store. Under the facts that you give, the only person who comes within the meaning of those words is the operator of the war~ehouse. He clearly operates and maintains the warehouse. If the warehouse in question is a store as that term is defined by the statute, the “store tax” applies to the operator of the warehouse and he is liable for the tar. Yours very truly, ATTORNE,Y GE,NE,RAL OF TEXAS BY s/ Cecil C. Rotsch Cecil C. Rotsch Assistant CCR:ew-rn APPROVED MAY 1, 1940 s/ Gerald C. Mann ATTORNE,Y GENERAL OF TEXAS APPROVEJ3 Opinion Committee By B.W.B., Chairman