3
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
AUSTIN
?&‘a! Xor A. Elshb
I;hbf Aogeunteint
Board or Caunty and Ditatrlat Road fndebtadtm a
dwatln, T0xm c\
wax 3121
?dr. 000. Aa Hight, page 8
County, 40 $8. 3. (Zd) 43, wherein the court saldr
“The oommiosloners~ oourt may expend oounty
road bond fund8 for improvement of oity streets
forming part of county road8 where made with
oity*s oonsent.*
It will be noted thkt these deolaions restrict a
oounty’s jurisdiotlon over the streets of an lnoorporated
oitp, but that where oounty roads form a part or the city
streeta, it seems ta be settled law that tha oounty has the
rlKht to expend county funds for the improvement of such
;o&, am though oonstltutlng a part of a olty thorough-
.
You are, therefore, advised that it is our opinion
thct the claim of Tarrant county is Legal, provided same
complies in, al.1 other reepeota with the provisions of House
Bl,. #MS, above olted.
Truski~ that the foregoiq eatlefaotorily answers
your inquitiy, we are
Very truly yours
BY (01
Clarenae E. Crowe
Assistant
AFI~ROT’ED(TAN, 10, lG40
(a) Gerald c. Mann
ATTORNEY
GEmSRAL
OF TXXAS
APFROVED
opinion committee
,By Bii
aairman
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Combined Opinion