Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE AlTORNN GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN Eon.&yneIalbYr8 countyiwitor c4 *=m 80, n, 0. E. 1911, r8aes 88 follcnmr 1 be allawed the county judge of one per otmtupon of rwoh am~cttim, ad- Y upon the approyal Hon. Wayne Iefevw, Page 2 Article 3850, supra, was.bro~ht lorward,ln the Revised Civil Statutes of 1925 in Artlole 3926, whioh reads in part a8 followsr "The oounty judge shall also reoelve the following Sees: "1. d oom~~laelon or one-half OS one per oent upon the eotual oaeh reaelpta of eaoh exeaubor, administrator or guardian, upon the approval ol the 'exhlblhe end the rinal settle- ment of the aooouut of suah exeo'utor, adminia- trator or guardian, but no uore than one suah oomlselon shall be ohargecl,on any emouut m- osived by any suah exeautor, administrator or guardian," We quote from the ease of Oriae vs. Coolep, et 170 6W 1088, as follows! "When are the aomiasiona pmvlUsQ tar by Artlole 3250 (mm Art. 39261 payable') ft is the oontention o? appellant.that thay a+ not payable until the guartlian'e final aooount Is approved., Appelleee oontend that they a* payable upon all oaah reaeipte shown by any annuati~eoount OS the guarilhn, wheti euah dooount Is approved by the jutl e to whcm It Is presslit- ed. Omitting r0=at f er5,the artlole provide19 that the aounty judge, in addition to other apecliied fees, shall %I allowed .*.., ~'o~QI- mission of one-half of 1 er sent. upon the ao- teal cash reoeipta of eaog i..,. guardian upon the approval of the exhchibfta and the f&l settlement of the aooount of suoh . . . . guaMIan,* provided only one suoh oharge shall be made. Prooeaalng on the theory that the faglalature,~ when It enaotod that euoh ices should bk'pald *upon' the approvnl of the exhiblfs'and the' rlnaz settlement of the aaoount' of the guar- dian, intended that full rorae and efffsot should Eon. Weyne Lefevre, Page 3 be given to both pmvislone, we oonolude that suoh ommlrrdons may be payable upon approval of the annual eocount or upon approval of the final eaoount, depending upon when the ~rdIan resolved the money upon whIoh the ocnnmIee.ion Ie.sou@t to be ool?ected. For illustration, it;upoti presentation of an annual aooount It discloses that oaeh has been reae i ved by t:-!e tpuxrdian p~rlorto such preaentatfon . and subsequent to any last annual aooount, such guardianwould be en%Itl+d to the speolfIed ooErmlssfona upon the approval of the acoount 80 preeented. On the other hand, if it appears fz~m the guardlan*s. f’inal acoount that slnae his last annual aooount further cash hae been received, he would be entitled to his oommlaslon thereon upon the approve1 of suah final aaaount . The reierende to the approval OS the guardian18 exhibits and the approval 0r Ns final eooount we regard ue merely rixinC:the period or time when~the county .judge may tax hls owimlsslons. By Article 4186, R. E. 1911, guardlane are required to present an annual aoaount’under oath showing, amory; other thinKs, ‘a ocmplete aooount of reoelpts end disbursements olnoe the last annual eooount.’ .Upon pr?- eentatlon of suoh annual account, It Is by subsequent provIsIons of the statutes made the duty of the then presiding county judge to oonduat a hearing thereon, and, Ii he is satisfied that/the aooount le oorreot, it is his duty to approve -s=e. Ravbq made It the duty of tho.oounty judr~e to approve such eooounta, and ha*- I= allowi$ a fee of one-h&! Of 1 per oent. upon the ‘eatual oaeh reoeipts shown thereby, It surely follows, It Seerae to us, that the oommisaiona are payable upon ouoh appaoval, for the reason that Eon. !‘&ayneLerevre, bee 4 they were clearly Intended for the~beneflt of the c?rrlcer psrromlng the duty, and, having been so Intended, It was never oon- tonplated that he should forego hls cc%- pensatlm until final settlenmt-a%:$hF es- tate, particularly when final settlemit nIQht not oonm until artier the lapse of $.nfn~ars and the possible death of the WJ do not, as lndloated, thlnk. the ref&enoe to flnal settlesent at ellsman- ln@ess. It Is very pmbebly tbst In many 2uardlanshlp ~roceedln~s oash would be re- oaived by tho ~uaMlan In the .perIod in- tervening between his last annual aooouut and the flnal account. If such oash was received, the oounty judge who hedtmd approved such final aooount would; be .on- titled to the comlsslon thereon, and the 8010 pwpos~, in 0~s opinion, for say rate* en06 to final settleaent, was to aeoure the osf loer In ths peymmt of the Yees aa- crulng at that time and whloh oould not be done under the ~rovlalon covering anuual accounts. "'We have treated the word *exhibits', in article J&50, as referring to annual aooounts. Wile It may not be said that the exhibit, either literalLy or in legal oontem- pletlon, meens account, It Is well knm that aooounts are often attached to plsadlngs es exhlblts. Such oustom, taken In oonnection with the reference In the ssns,atiIole to oash pe- aeipts rsqulred.to be shovs.ln snuual aocounta by article 4106, l?. 8. 1911, and the further faot that the annual aaoouuts required Oi &her fidualarles are referred to ns snnual exhibits (articles 324., 3242, R. 2. 19.911) sue in our'oplnlon sufflclent basis for hold- ing that anmal accounts were Intended." Artlolfe3320 and 3321, R. C. S. read as fol- low3 : "h-t. 3320. Exeoutors end adminietra- tort? shall ma& annual exhibits under oath, fully nhowlnq the ccndltlon or the estate; they shall n&n final settlement of the eu- tatea they represent.rithin three years from the 3-t of letters, unless the tfms be extended by the oourt after satlsfaotory showing laeda under oath; and, upon fatiure in either 0888, shall be removed as provided by law. "Art. 3321. Any exhibit made by qn ere- outor or administrator showing a list of olaims allowed and approved or established a&nst the estate he represents, or ehavt@g the condition-of said estate and an aooount of all money received ati paid out on aoootmt of 8atd eatate, returned to the oourt betore the liliyr of the aocount for final*eettle- ment, 5hal.l be filed with the clerk, and notioe of muoh filw shall be posted at the oourthouse door tcr ten days from the postin& after whloh the onurt shall examine. aald exhibit, and if correct, render judqent of approval thereon and order it to be reoord- ed." In vim of the foregoing authorities, you are respectfully advised that it.ia the oplnion.of this de- partment thst the one-half of one per cent oommlst3ion iron the reoelpts of properties handled bye an adminis- trator is paya!:le to the county judge upon the aubmlsslon of exhibits and the annual report and that auoh oommlesfon is not payable at the time of the sales “of the property. TrustLng that the foregoing answers your inquiry, we remain Very truly yours