Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS / AUSTIN Mr. 0. J. S. Elllngson General Manager Texas Prison Syetem Huu~svllle, Texas Dear Sir: Your lette~ec\~yd&emed to thle orrice reads as follows: es, 1938 to Bureau of Re- self-explanatory: dated November nch Warrant to eoember 17, rrant to Hunts- te in an Interview with the Claaslfl- t on November 21, 195S ". . . that ve day8 afber he was released on o Limestone County on 12-17-37 he to the Department of Public Safety at as a mechanlo for the Departxmnt 0r Public sarety . . . that for two months of this time he was carried on the payroll aa a mechanic at $75.00 per month . . . that during a part of this ten month8 period he lived with his wife and family at 1207 Viest 34th Street In Austin . . . that it was decided that it wa8 best for him to return to the Texas Prison System after the Arthur Huey chse had Mr. 0. J. 5. Elllngson, Page 2 received so muoh publlolty and that it was possible that he might return to work for the Department in the event that he was suooeseful in obtaining an early rsleass by olemenop. “‘Inasmuoh as this prisoner was in the oustody of the Sheriff only five days of the period that elapsed between Deoember 17, 1937 and November 15, 193S, he should be oredited ‘on his sentence during this period only fire days as we will have to oon- alder the rest of the tlae the same as ii he were an esoape as we do not know of any right that the Sheriff or anyone else may have had to release this inmate to anyone exoept at the expiration oi his term or through a reprieve, parole or some bther form of 0lemBnoy.’ “I would like to know if my ruling as General Manager is legally oorreot. Respeotfully, (Signed) 0. J. S: Elllngson General Manager 0JSE:wr P.S. I also enolose full oopy of his olassltloatlon report which is attaohed hereto for any other informa& tion you may desire regarding his interview with our Claesitloatlon Department.” In the ease of Ex Parte Lowe, .‘94 Tex. Grim. Rep. 307, the Court or Criminal Appeals saldt “Vie know of no statute in terns dlreotlng the issuance ot the warrant in question, but at oommon law and in practice, a warrant issued from the benoh or court for the arrest of a party is denominated a *benoh warrant’ . Webster’s Dlot . See also Cyo. of Law k Prao. Vol. 12, p. 343. It is the writ used to oompel the attendancr in oases ot oontempt committed out of oourt (Cyo. Vol. 40, p. 2163,) It is also the writ used to bring a oonvlct confined in the penlten- tlary to trial in another ease. See Hernandez Y. State, . . xr. 0. J. 9. RlllngsOn, Page 3 4 Texa8 Crlm. App. 425; Gaines Y, State, 63 S.W. Rep. 623; Warhlngton v. State, 1 Texas Grim. App. 6471 Rx Parte Jones, 38 Texas Crlm. Rep. 142.” While you de not state ior what purpose the benoh warrant wa8 168ued, we must presume that it was issued by a Court or Judge oorrmandlng the General Lanagsr or Warden o? the Texas Prlron System to deliver the custody o? the named oonvlot to the oifloer named in the warrant end oommanding the o??loer to bring said oonvlot before the issuing authority ?or the purpose stated in the warrant. In obedlenoe to the warrant, the oonvlot was relearned rrom the penitentiary by delivering him to the Shorl?? o? Limestone County, It is made to appear that said sherl??, about iire days after ho obtained oustody o? the oonvlot, released him to the Department o? Pub110 Saietp o? the State o? Texas. By what authority he was 80 released is not shown. But rrom the etatements made by the oonvlot to the penitentiary o??l- olals aster his return to the penitentiary, we lnier it was et the request o? that Department; that the Department held no benoh warrant ?or the oonviot; but desired to um him as an Qnderoover man” in the apprehension o? other orlmlnals. A representative of the Department, ramlllar with all o? the iaots oonoernlng the release of the oonvlot to the Department by the Sheriff, has advised the writer that the convlot was released to the Department wlthout the iomallty o? legal prooess, It is undisputed that the oonvlot had reoelved no ions o? olexenoy iron the Governor whloh would exouae his ab- senoe irom the penitentiary. What the convlot did and was permitted to do arter he was released by the Sherl?? to the Department up to the time he was returned to the nltentlary is stated in your letter and in the Bureau o? r lasal?lcatlon~s report on this oonvlot attaohed thereto. In view o? all the faots and olroumstanoea therein etated, it may be said that the oonvlot was an eecape tram the time he was released by the sherl?? until he was received at the penitentiary, a period o? nearly eleven months. There are several kinds o? escape recognized by our atatutea and oourts. Articlee 318, 31Sa, 319, 320, 321, 322 Vernon’s Penal Code, and cases there olted; 17 Tex. Jur. p. 57 . .: , Mr. 0. J. 9. Elllngson, Page 4 et seq. These statutes and authorities. pertain more to orrl- oere, their duties and llabllltles than to the subject or what oonetltut ea an eeoape. An escape may be made in eeveral different ways. The elements of escape are stated in 10 R.C.L. pp. 579, 580, as ?ol- lows : WElsments of Esoape .- Escape, prison breaking and rescue have in oommon one purpose and that 1s the regaining by a person in the custody of the law of his unrestrained freedom. They differ, however, in the method by whloh that freedom is attained. The. escape may be defined to be the voluntary de- parture o? a person without force from the law?ul custody of an o??lOer or from any place where he le law?ully oonilned. It is also the dellveranoe of a prleoner who is laniully imprisoned before he la entitled to such dellveranoe by law. Escapee are eometlmes olasslfled as aotual and oonetruotlve, negligent and voluntary. A oonstruotlve escape takes place when the prisoner obtains M)re liberty than the law allows although he still remain8 in oonflnement. Voluntary esoape has been defined by etatuts to oonslst in voluntarily suiferlng, permlt- tlng or conniving at the escape of a prisoner from custody or permitting him to go at large by the officer having law?ul oustody of him. It is not neoessary that the officer do this with the intent to save the prisoner from trial or the execution of a sentence, and therefore euoh intent le not one of the elements oonstltuting ths offense. An escape in law has two separate meanings. The one involves the aot of the prisoner, the other the act of the orrloer having him in oustody~. When the prisoner goes away from his place of law?ul oustody, the escape is the act of the prisoner; but when the prisoner 18 allowed to leave his place of con?lne.nent, either negligently or voluntarily, by the offloer having him in oustody, the escape is the act of the otfloer. In either event, whether a person under lawful arrest and restrained of hle liberty evades suoh arrest and restraint through his own act or by sufferance of the offloer, and goes at large before delivered by due oourae of law, an escape is committed.” .-, . Mr. 0. J, 3. Ellingeon, Page 6 ir our opinion that the aonvlot Van Thurman, It NO. 85961, should be oonaldered as on esoepe from the tie he was r&leased by the Sheriff of Llmwtone County until he was received baok et the penitentiary. Yours very truly ATTORNEYGDIERALOF Bruoe W. Bryant Assistant BWBIBBB APPROVECJCJN 24, 1939 A**ORNE-Y GENERALOF TmB