Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN Februssy 17, 1939 HOnorable L. A. :'ooZs State Superintendent Department of Education Austin, Texas Dear Sir: in aanea seesh3n, ana be- lp t~foat 88C%thWI Of '1%X&a from the iat.ana e~Me& ssme to two Other e0rmn0n~e &a the county Boar& Of Scurry County have the autI%wity to qetaeh mid terri- tory after the election for sOiwi0iiastionhtta been held, antibefore the new distrfct had been declared by the CorHnissioners*Caurt?* iion.1. A. 'ioods,yabruary 19, 193Q; Pegs 2 In raply - _ thereto. thie Is to advise that're have ln- vostigete6 tP.iea6se from the facta givea to us as disaloeed by the coxamications a:-& other written mtter in au= f:le in cn- neotloa xfth t:Zisrw~est, a:.<**eax 31 tLe opinion t!iattiie ~uprez~eZmrt of IJX~.Bhas definitely answerer:tke c,ueetion la the case of Ltate v. kkksr, 40 S. Vi. (26) 41, uhereln the court stated: *It is mar opinion that, even if It be c.onoeded that the orOer8 of the uountp bwx-6 with reference to the tmrltory of district ?Io.16 wxld have beem In all respects leeal 1s the nbssaqe of the penCing rleatioa, still the rlgPt of the people to vote on incoorporat;ion, hftViAg been flat lawfully ilfvoked, would not be,Interfemd olth or defeated by the oonnty board pending the ,.holdln@of the deation, aad the deelaratiozr of Ita roiult. Thir ie certainlythe uarreot rule, even ff it Do aotmedad that the power ~of~~thoie' COwaT Iward 6nd th6 right af tha psopre wora uu-~rdi~6to or equ6Lg Touravary trlaly OFl!%xAs oso. 5. &rrry Am3i8taab (WB;%