Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THEA-ITORNEY GENERAL AUSTIN January Er. i"isrren KoDoncld County Attornay Sal trl county Tyler, Texas Dear Yr. MoDonnld: 190. C-103 ity of 4)?a Colleo- accept payment 0T nent taxes without ent of school and roe4 res that wnre Aelinquent ars prior to the datr. it wne ffled. he following question llnquent contraot , does a County for oomnon nnd he authorIt to ant of delinquent taxes wlthout the 01 and road taxes that are delinquent t.owSh Late the suit wn8 filed?" to ycur quejtlon you are respectfully ad- our oyinlon where a tar contract ie in pro- oess and tax suits are flled, a oolleotor may accept the pap- ment of dtllnquent taxes without the payment of school and rosd taxes that are delinquent ten yews prior to the data the suit was riled. However, R tax collcator could not clre the tu payer s clear reaelpt, or a stateaent that all taxes had heon paid. . , Mr. Karren KoDonald, January 18, 1939, Page 2. The reoolpt would merely show the amount of taxes paid and the years ror whloh paid, and the school and road tax would at111 be due and unpaid, krtlole 7298, Revised Civil Statute $rovlder in part as to11ows : “. . . . . provided, that no suit shell be brought for the oolleotlon of delinquent taxes of a School Die- triot or Road Dletrlct unless instituted within ‘ten years Srom the time the same shall beoome delinquent.” It la our opinion that this provlelon i.n Article 7298 la a ton year statute of limitation on oolleotlon of delinquent taxem due a.school distrlot or a road district. In order to take advantage of-the limitation period th4 tax paper would have to speolally plead and set up his right6 under this ton year statute. In the absence of such special plesdlng by the tax payer, the attorney brlnglng the tex suit, could take judgment iOr the sohool and road tat, delinquent ten years prior to the date the suit was filed even though the other taxes had been paid. Yours very truly ATTORNEY GENERALOF TZXAS COB:CFS AYFRGVED: $,J ATTORNEY OEN-ERAL GF TEXAS f’$