NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 22 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BRADLEY JIMMY MICHAEL No. 12-74017
PRATASIK,
Agency No. A095-315-676
Petitioner,
v. MEMORANDUM *
JEFF B. SESSIONS, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 14, 2017**
Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.
Bradley Jimmy Michael Pratasik, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions
for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his
untimely motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8
U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
reopen, Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010), and we deny the
petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Pratasik’s motion to reopen
because he failed to establish materially changed country conditions in Indonesia
to qualify for an exception to the time limitation for filing a motion to reopen. See
8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii), Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 978-79 (evidence must be
“qualitatively different” to warrant reopening).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
2 12-74017