United States v. Francisco Ortiz-Rodriguez

Case: 16-41212 Document: 00513898023 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/06/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 16-41212 FILED Summary Calendar March 6, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. FRANCISCO ORTIZ-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:15-CR-198-2 Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Francisco Ortiz-Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ortiz-Rodriguez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 16-41212 Document: 00513898023 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/06/2017 No. 16-41212 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2