In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 16-586V
Filed: November 23, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
****************************
NANCY TYREE, *
*
Petitioner, * Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
v. * Tetanus-Diphtheria-Acellular Pertussis
* (“Tdap”); Shoulder Injury Related to
SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”);
AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)
*
Respondent. *
*
****************************
Paul Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.
Adriana Teitel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
On May 17, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine
Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
administration (“SIRVA”) following a July 3, 2015 tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis
(“Tdap”) vaccine. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit
of the Office of Special Masters.
On October 17, 2016, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner
entitled to compensation for a SIRVA. On November 23, 2016, respondent filed a
proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded
$80,000.00. Proffer at 2. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees
1
Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
2
National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
with the proffered award. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that
petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards
petitioner a lump sum payment of $80,000.00 in the form of a check payable to
petitioner, Nancy Tyree. This amount represents compensation for all damages that
would be available under § 300aa-15(a).
The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
decision.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Nora Beth Dorsey
Nora Beth Dorsey
Chief Special Master
3
Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
NANCY TYREE,
Petitioner,
v. No. 16-586
Chief Special Master Dorsey
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ECF
HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION 1
On May 17, 2016, Nancy Tyree (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation (“Petition”)
under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine
Act” or “Act”), as amended. The Petition alleges that petitioner received a tetanus-diphtheria-
acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccination on July 3, 2015, and subsequently suffered “left shoulder
injuries.” Petition at 1 (Preamble).
On October 17, 2016, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”) filed a
Vaccine Rule 4(c) Report, conceding that petitioner suffered from a shoulder injury related to
vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), and recommending that the Court award petitioner
compensation. Respondent hereby submits the following proffer regarding the award of
compensation.
1
This proffer does not include attorneys’ fees and costs, which the parties intend to discuss after the Damages
Decision is issued.
I. Items of Compensation
Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded
$80,000.00, which represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled
under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.
II. Form of the Award
Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made
through a lump sum payment of $80,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. 2
Petitioner agrees.
Respectfully submitted,
BENJAMIN C. MIZER
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
Acting Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
CATHARINE E. REEVES
Acting Deputy Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
ALTHEA W. DAVIS
Senior Trial Counsel
Torts Branch, Civil Division
/s/ Adriana Teitel
ADRIANA TEITEL
Trial Attorney
Torts Branch, Civil Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 146, Benjamin Franklin Station
Washington, DC 20044-0146
Tel: (202) 616-3677
Dated: November 23, 2016
2
Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate
relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and
future pain and suffering.