UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1891
GLENN A. STEWART,
Petitioner,
v.
RIVERSIDE TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED; TRANSPORTATION
INSURANCE; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
(15-0436)
Submitted: February 28, 2017 Decided: March 14, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andrew Hanley, Andrew Penny, CROSSLEY MCINTOSH COLLIER HANLEY &
EDES, PLLC, Wilmington, North Carolina, for Petitioner.
M. Patricia Smith, Solicitor of Labor, Maia S. Fisher, Associate
Solicitor, Mark Reinhalter, Counsel for Longshore, Sean G.
Bajkowski, Counsel for Appellate Litigation, Matthew W. Boyle,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for
Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Glenn A. Stewart seeks review of the Benefits Review
Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law
judge’s denial of longshore disability benefits pursuant to
33 U.S.C. §§ 901-950 (2012). Our review of the record discloses
that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and
is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition
for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Stewart v.
Riverside Tech., Inc., No. 15-0436 (B.R.B. June 6, 2016). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2