15-3965IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
JOSE ALEJANDRO PEREZ-FLORES,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D15-3965
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed March 31, 2017
Appeal from the Circuit Court
for Orange County,
Marc L. Lubet, Judge.
Jennifer M. Manyen, of Appeals Law Group,
Orlando, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,
Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant
Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for
Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Jose Alejandro Perez-Flores appeals his convictions and sentences following a
jury trial for attempted manslaughter by act with a weapon and aggravated battery with a
deadly weapon or causing great bodily harm. We affirm his convictions, but reverse his
sentence on the aggravated battery and remand for further proceedings.
Perez-Flores argues, and the State properly concedes, the trial court improperly
reclassified Perez-Flores’s conviction for aggravated battery with a deadly weapon or
causing great bodily harm from a second-degree felony to a first-degree felony, and
thereafter, imposed a twenty-year sentence. Reclassification of aggravated battery is not
permitted when, as here, it is not clear whether the defendant was found guilty based on
a finding that he caused great bodily harm or that he used a deadly weapon. While
aggravated battery inflicting great bodily harm is subject to enhancement if a weapon is
used, aggravated battery using a deadly weapon is not because use of a deadly weapon
is an essential element of the crime. See, e.g., Lareau v. State, 573 So. 2d 813, 815 (Fla.
1991); Brady v. State, 65 So. 3d 599, 601 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011); Hernandez v. State, 30
So. 3d 610, 612 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); Benjamin v. State, 8 So. 3d 460, 460 (Fla. 4th DCA
2009); Webb v. State, 997 So. 2d 469 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008). Here, the jury was instructed
on both forms of aggravated battery and it is unclear whether the jury found Perez-Flores
guilty of one or the other form of aggravated battery. Thus, reclassification was improper.
Accordingly, we reverse and remand for resentencing with the aggravated battery
classified as a second-degree felony.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED for resentencing.
PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., and BOATWRIGHT, J., Associate Judge, concur.
2