Papst Licensing Gmbh & Co. Kg v. Xilinx, Inc.

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG, Plaintiff-Appellant v. XILINX, INC., Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2016-2323 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 5:16-cv-00925-LHK, Judge Lucy H. Koh. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ NICOLE E. GLAUSER, DiNovo, Price, Ellwanger & Har- dy LLP, Austin, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by ANDREW DINOVO, JAY D. ELLWANGER. MATTHEW J. SILVEIRA, Jones Day, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by PATRICK THOMAS MICHAEL; DAVID B. COCHRAN, Cleveland, OH. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 12, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court