Papst Licensing Gmbh & Co. Kg v. Xilinx, Inc.

       NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

       PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG,
               Plaintiff-Appellant

                           v.

                    XILINX, INC.,
                  Defendant-Appellee
                ______________________

                      2016-2323
                ______________________

   Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of California in No. 5:16-cv-00925-LHK,
Judge Lucy H. Koh.
                 ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

    NICOLE E. GLAUSER, DiNovo, Price, Ellwanger & Har-
dy LLP, Austin, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also
represented by ANDREW DINOVO, JAY D. ELLWANGER.

   MATTHEW J. SILVEIRA, Jones Day, San Francisco, CA,
argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by
PATRICK THOMAS MICHAEL; DAVID B. COCHRAN, Cleveland,
OH.
               ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

   PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and
TARANTO, Circuit Judges).
           AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                      ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT


 April 12, 2017               /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
       Date                   Peter R. Marksteiner
                              Clerk of Court