NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 18 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-50394
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:13-cr-07096-DMS
v.
MEMORANDUM*
ANGELINO RODRIGUEZ-BARCENAS,
a.k.a. Manuel Honorio Rodriguez,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of California
Dana M. Sabraw, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 11, 2017**
Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Angelino Rodriguez-Barcenas appeals from the revocation of supervised
release and the 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Rodriguez-Barcenas’s counsel has filed a brief
stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
counsel of record.
Because Rodriguez-Barcenas has fully served his sentence and is not subject
to a term of supervised release, we dismiss this appeal as moot. See Spencer v.
Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 14 (1998); United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th
Cir. 1999).
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
2 15-50394