NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 11 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 16-10324
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:04-cr-02244-CKJ
v.
MEMORANDUM *
ARLENE MARTINEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 8, 2017**
Before: REINHARDT, LEAVY, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Arlene Martinez appeals from the district court’s order denying her motion
for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction under
28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Martinez contends that the district court abused its discretion by denying her
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
motion for a sentence reduction under Amendment 782 to the Sentencing
Guidelines. The district court properly interpreted and applied U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10
in considering Martinez’s motion and did not abuse its discretion by denying
Martinez a sentence reduction based on her criminal history, her role in the
offense, and her post-offense conduct. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10 cmt. n.1(B); United
States v. Dunn, 728 F.3d 1151, 1155 (9th Cir. 2013). Contrary to Martinez’s
contention, the district court adequately explained its determination that a
reduction was unwarranted. See United States v. Trujillo, 713 F.3d 1003, 1010
(9th Cir. 2013).
AFFIRMED.
2 16-10324