Lklp Cac Inc. v. Brandon Fleming

RENDERED_: JUNE 15, 2017 TO BE PUBLISHED §§npreme Tnnrt of Béntuckg 2016-sc-0_00407-Wc LKLP cAc INC. . 1 AP`PELLANT ON APPEAL FROM COURT OF APPEALS _ ` CASE NO. 2016-CA-000163-WC V. \ WORKERS’ COM‘PENSATION BOARD ' ` NO. 09-WC-97826 BRA_NDON FLEMING; APPELLEES HON. ‘R. ROLAND CASE, ' ' ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE; AND WORKERS’ cOMPE-NSATION BOARD opinion oF THE coUR'r BY JUs'rrcE KELLE_R`. AFFIRMING In 2010, an Administrative Law Judge [ALJ) awarded Brandon Flerning` permanent partial disability benefits based on a finding that Fleming had a l physical impairment rating of 13% and a psychological impairment rating o`f 5% for a combined permanent impairment rating of 17%. Fleming- filed a motion to reopen his claim in 2014 alleging that his condition had yvorsened.\ 'A different ALJ found that Flerning had a physical impairment rating pf 23% and a psychological impairment rating of 12% for a combined permanent impairment rating of 32%.1 LKLP CAC Inc. (LKLP) appealed, and a divided 'Workers’ Compensation Board (the Board] affirmed. LKLP then sought review before the Court of Appeals, which also affirmed Bei`ore us, as it did before then Board and the Court of Appeals, LKLP argues that the ALJ’s opinion is not supported by evidence of substance because the ALJ relied on a physician who stated that Fleming’s permanent impairment rating had not changed following the 2010 opinion and award. As did the majority of the Board and the Court of Appeals, we disagree that the ALJ’s'iindings are not properly supported by the evidence and affirm. - I. BACKGROUNI_). Fleming Worked as a youth director for LKLP, a community action agency. On October 22, 2007, Fleming suffered a work-related back injury when the van he was driving was struck from behind. In September 2008, 7 Fleming underwent lumbar spine fusion surgery, which initially alleviated some of his leg symptoms, and he returned to work. However, Fleming continued to suffer from low back pain that was aggravated by standing or sitting for long periods and he stopped working in August 2010. We note that, in addition to his physical complaints, Fleming complained of irritability and depression. However, the only issues before us are related to Fleming’s physical 1 The 17% and 32% permanent impairment ratings were calculated using the “Combined Values Chart” on pages 604- 06 1n Linda Cocchiarella and Gunnar B. J. Andersson, AMA Gu.ides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impai.rn:cent (5'¢h ed. 2012). complaints; therefore, we do not further address Fleming’s psychological condition. LKLP disputed`the work-relatedness of Fleming’s injury, and Fleming iiie