Matter of Jon Z. (Margaret Z.)

Matter of Jon Z. (Margaret Z.) (2017 NY Slip Op 04998)

Matter of Jon Z. (Margaret Z.)

2017 NY Slip Op 04998

Decided on June 16, 2017

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 16, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, CURRAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

805 CA 16-02066

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF JON Z. AND VICTOR Z. FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A GUARDIAN OF THE PROPERTY ANDOR PERSON OF MARGARET Z., AN ALLEGED INCAPACITATED PERSON. ——————————————————————— JON Z., PETITIONER-APPELLANT; THERESA M. GIROUARD, ESQ., APPOINTED GUARDIAN FOR MARGARET Z., AN ALLEGED INCAPACITATED PERSON, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

JON Z., PETITIONER-APPELLANT PRO SE.

SCHMITT & LASCURETTES, LLC, UTICA (WILLIAM P. SCHMITT OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Samuel D. Hester, J.), entered October 13, 2016. The order denied the motion of petitioner to compel respondent to provide certain evidence, and for other relief.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: In this guardianship proceeding, petitioner appeals from an order denying his motion for, among other relief, removal of respondent as guardian of petitioner's incapacitated mother. Supreme Court concluded that the issues raised in petitioner's motion had previously been raised by petitioner and determined by the court in earlier proceedings. We are unable to determine the merits of petitioner's contentions on appeal inasmuch as the 40-page record before us does not contain sufficient information to enable us to determine whether the court properly denied petitioner's motion on that ground. Petitioner, as the appellant, "submitted this appeal on an incomplete record and must suffer the consequences" (Matter of Santoshia L., 202 AD2d 1027, 1028; see Resetarits Constr. Corp. v City of Niagara Falls, 133 AD3d 1229, 1229; Matter of Rodriguez v Ward, 43 AD3d 640, 641).

Entered: June 16, 2017

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court