Case: 16-11059 Document: 00514045276 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 16-11059 FILED
Summary Calendar June 22, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Clerk
Plaintiff–Appellee,
v.
ALEXANDER COBOS, also known as Moe,
Defendant–Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:15-CR-129-10
Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Alexander Cobos has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Cobos has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant
portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Cobos’s response. We concur
with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 16-11059 Document: 00514045276 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/22/2017
No. 16-11059
appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Cobos’s motion to file a pro se
brief is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir.
1998).
2