NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 3 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOHN CARLOS TORRES, No. 16-56023
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:16-cv-00302-JFW-SP
v.
MEMORANDUM*
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, Its
Successors and/or Assigns; DOES, 1-25
Inclusive,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
John F. Walter, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 26, 2017**
Before: PAEZ, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
John Carlos Torres appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his action seeking rescission of his home loan due to alleged violations
of the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
§ 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P.
12(b)(6). Dumas v. Kipp, 90 F.3d 386, 389 (9th Cir. 1996). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Torres’ action because Torres’ TILA
rescission claim is time-barred. See 15 U.S.C. § 1635(f) (borrower has three years
to rescind under TILA); Miguel v. Country Funding Corp., 309 F.3d 1161, 1164
(9th Cir. 2002) (three-year limitation period under TILA is a statute of repose that
once expired completely extinguishes the underlying right).
We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued
in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on
appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).
AFFIRMED.
2 16-56023