NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court."
Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the
parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R.1:36-3.
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-5719-14T3
PNC BANK,
Plaintiff,
v.
CVFF DEVELOPMENT CORP. and
JOSEPH FAVALORO,
Defendants,
and
THOMAS FAVORITO and GEORGE
D. CATTABIANI, JR.,
Defendants-Respondents,
and
JOHN VERDIGI,
Defendant-Appellant.
______________________________________
Submitted June 26, 2017 – Decided July 13, 2017
Before Judges Fisher and Fasciale.
On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey,
Law Division, Bergen County, Docket No. L-
8319-11.
Newman & Denburg, L.L.C., attorneys for
appellant (Gary S. Newman, on the brief).
Walsh & Walsh, attorneys for respondent Thomas
Favorito (John K. Walsh, Jr., of counsel and
on the brief).
Stern & Stern, L.L.P. attorneys for respondent
George D. Cattabiani, Jr., join in the brief
of respondent Thomas Favorito.
PER CURIAM
Defendant John Verdigi appeals from a June 18, 2015 order
confirming an arbitration award; a July 21, 2015 order awarding
arbitrator's fees and costs; and a July 21, 2015 order granting
plaintiff's petition for post-judgment discovery.
On appeal, defendant argues the following points:
Point I
STANDARD OF REVIEW.
Point II
THE ARBITRATOR'S DECISION TO "FORFEIT" THE
LOANS AND AWARD ATTORNEY'S FEES EXCEEDED THE
SCOPE OF HIS AUTHORITY.
A) Grounds to modify or vacate Arbitrator's
Award[.]
B) The arbitrator cannot rule on issues not
before [h]im never raised by any party.
C[)] The forfeiture of the loans had no legal
or factual basis and is absurd[.]
2 A-5719-14T3
We conclude that defendant's arguments are without sufficient
merit to warrant discussion in a written opinion. R. 2:11-
3(e)(1)(E).
Affirmed.
3 A-5719-14T3