NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 19 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARTHA LOPEZ LOPEZ, No. 13-70931
Petitioner, Agency No. A070-209-566
v.
MEMORANDUM*
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney
General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted July 11, 2017**
Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
Martha Lopez Lopez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of
the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an
immigration judge’s decision finding her removable. We have jurisdiction under
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law and constitutional claims.
Martinez-Medina v. Holder, 673 F.3d 1029, 1033 (9th Cir. 2011). We deny the
petition for review.
The agency did not err or violate due process in finding Lopez Lopez
removable as charged, because Samayoa-Martinez v. Holder forecloses her
contention that her statements to immigration officials at the border were
unconstitutionally obtained in violation of 8 C.F.R. § 287.3(c). 558 F.3d 897, 901-
02 (9th Cir. 2009); see Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (an alien
must show error and substantial prejudice to prevail on a due process claim).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
2 13-70931