STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, UNPUBLISHED
July 27, 2017
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v No. 331954
Saginaw Circuit Court
LARRY DUANE CURRINGTON, LC No. 14-040592-FC
Defendant-Appellant.
Before: MARKEY, P.J., and RONAYNE KRAUSE and BOONSTRA, JJ.
RONAYNE KRAUSE, J. (concurring).
I concur with the majority in all respects but one. Because I agree that the challenged
statement from Detective Scott was harmless irrespective of whether it was hearsay, I would
simply presume that it was hearsay and decline to decide that issue. The majority includes a
paragraph that begins with “Further, even if the challenged testimony were hearsay and thus
admitted in error . . . ” it did not affect “the outcome of the trial.” Thus, I see no reason to make
that decision with the limited facts in this case. In all other respects, I concur.
/s/ Amy Ronayne Krause
-1-