Case: 16-11147 Date Filed: 08/03/2017 Page: 1 of 3
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-11147
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:15-cr-00396-SCB-AEP-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LATELLIS EVERETTE,
Defendant - Appellant.
________________________
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(August 3, 2017)
Before TJOFLAT, WILLIAM PRYOR, and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Latellis Everette appeals his 180-month sentence, imposed within the
applicable advisory guideline range, after he pled guilty to one count of being a
Case: 16-11147 Date Filed: 08/03/2017 Page: 2 of 3
felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e).
Because binding precedent forecloses Mr. Everette’s argument on appeal, we
affirm.
We generally review de novo whether a defendant’s prior conviction
qualifies as a violent felony under the Armed Career Criminal Act. See United
States v. Hill, 799 F.3d 1318, 1321 (11th Cir. 2015). The ACCA carries a
mandatory minimum sentence of 15 years’ imprisonment when a defendant “has
three prior convictions for a violent felony or serious drug offense.” Id. (citing
§ 924(e)(1).
Here, Mr. Everette had four ACCA-qualifying predicate offenses, and the
district court therefore sentenced him to the statutory minimum of 15 years’ (or
180 months’) imprisonment. Mr. Everette does not challenge two of the
underlying offenses that led to his classification as an armed career criminal, but
contends that his two 1992 Florida armed robbery convictions are not “violent
felonies” under the ACCA.1
Mr. Everette concedes that his argument is foreclosed by binding circuit
precedent, see Br. of Appellant at 5, but raises the issue only to preserve it for
further review. See United States v. Fritts, 841 F.3d 937, 944 (11th Cir. 2016)
1
Based on a total offense level of 30 and a criminal history category of V, the advisory
guidelines range was 151 to 188 months’ imprisonment. Mr. Everette’s predicate offenses
included an aggravated assault, a sale of a controlled substance, and two armed robberies
committed on separate occasions.
2
Case: 16-11147 Date Filed: 08/03/2017 Page: 3 of 3
(holding that a defendant’s 1989 armed robbery conviction under Fla. Stat.
§ 812.13 categorically qualifies as a “violent felony” under the ACCA’s elements
clause), cert. denied, No. 16-7883, 2017 WL 554569 (U.S. June 19, 2017). See
also United States v. Seabrooks, 839 F.3d 1326, 1341 (11th Cir. 2016) (holding
that a defendant’s 1995 armed robbery conviction under Fla. Stat. § 812.13
categorically qualifies as a “violent felony” under the ACCA), cert. denied, No.
16-8072, 2017 WL 715744 (U.S. June 19, 2017).
Because we are bound by the decisions of prior panels until they are
overruled by this court sitting en banc or by the Supreme Court, see United States
v. Steele, 147 F.3d 1316, 1317–18 (11th Cir. 1998) (en banc), we affirm Mr.
Everette’s sentence.2
AFFIRMED.
2
Although we denied the government’s motion for summary affirmance in May of 2017, we
allowed the government to use that motion as its response brief for this appeal.
3