MEMORANDUM DECISION
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D),
this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED
regarded as precedent or cited before any Aug 07 2017, 8:32 am
court except for the purpose of establishing
CLERK
the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court
Court of Appeals
estoppel, or the law of the case. and Tax Court
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE
Leanna Weissmann Curtis T. Hill, Jr.
Lawrenceburg, Indiana Attorney General of Indiana
James B. Martin
Deputy Attorney General
Indianapolis, Indiana
IN THE
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
Donald C. Powers, Jr., August 7, 2017
Appellant-Defendant, Court of Appeals Case No.
16A05-1612-CR-2855
v. Appeal from the Decatur Superior
Court
State of Indiana, The Honorable Matthew Bailey,
Appellee-Plaintiff Judge
Trial Court Cause Nos.
16D01-1502-F2-109
16D01-1507-F1-482
May, Judge.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 16A05-1612-CR-2855 | August 7, 2017 Page 1 of 13
[1] Donald C. Powers, Jr. appeals the aggregate thirty-year sentence imposed after
he pled guilty under separate cause numbers to Level 3 felony burglary 1 and
Level 3 felony attempted aggravated battery. 2 Powers raises one issue on
appeal, which we restate as whether his sentences are inappropriate in light of
the nature of his offenses and his character. We affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
[2] On February 27, 2015, Powers was subject to a no-contact order that was
imposed as a condition of bail in a Level 5 felony case against Powers in Ripley
County. That no-contact order prohibited Powers from contacting his wife,
Shannon, from whom Powers was estranged. Shannon was living in a house
she was renting for herself, where Powers had never lived, and to which
Shannon had never given Powers access. Powers was living elsewhere.
[3] On that day, Powers broke into Shannon’s home. She repeatedly asked him to
leave, but Powers threw her down on the couch and began choking her.
Shannon tried to yell to alert her neighbor that she needed help. Powers put his
hand over her mouth so that she could not breathe, and he threatened to kill
her. Powers hit Shannon in the mouth causing her to bleed. As she was trying
to breathe and fight Powers off, Powers pulled a knife and said “is this really
the way you want to go?” (State’s Ex. 1 at 9.) Powers then said, “You don’t
1
Ind. Code § 35-43-2-1(2) (2014).
2
Ind. Code §§ 35-41-5-1 (attempt) (2014); 35-42-2-1.5 (aggravated battery) (2014).
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 16A05-1612-CR-2855 | August 7, 2017 Page 2 of 13
have to do this. We could get back together, and everything would be fine.”
(Id.) Shannon managed to get outside the house, but the altercation continued
and Powers tackled her as she tried to call 911. After Powers left, Shannon
went to the emergency room, where she was found to have a sprained left
ankle, bruises around her neck and her rib cage, bruises and scratches on her
arm, and a busted lip.
[4] After visiting the emergency room, Shannon reported the event to police and
provided sworn testimony of the events before a judge, who issued a warrant for
Powers’ arrest. The State charged Powers with Level 2 felony burglary with
intent to commit intimidation or confinement, while armed with a deadly
weapon. 3 Over the next two weeks, Shannon had telephone contact with
Powers and tried to persuade him to turn himself in to police. Instead Powers
threatened to kill himself and blamed Shannon for his situation.
[5] At some point, Powers told police he would turn himself in, but he did not
arrive when he said he would, so the Decatur County Sheriff’s Department,
with assistance from the Indiana State Police fugitive team, began looking for
him to serve the arrest warrant. When those authorities could not locate
Powers, the Sheriff’s Department requested assistance from a task force headed
by the United States Marshall’s Service. Trooper Shaun Hannon, a detective
with the Indiana State Police, who also served on the United States Marshall’s
3
Ind. Code § 35-43-2-1(3)(A) (2014).
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 16A05-1612-CR-2855 | August 7, 2017 Page 3 of 13
Service task force, was assigned the duty of serving Powers with the warrant.
Detective Hannon was able to locate Powers by tracking his cell phone, and on
March 11, 2015, twelve task force officers approached the house where they
believed Powers was hiding. Officers were told Powers had fled the house, was
wearing a ghillie suit, 4 did not want to go back to prison, was armed, and was
prepared to take “extreme measures” to avoid being taken into custody. (Tr. at
46.) After learning Powers had fled the house, Detective Hannon requested
additional assistance. Approximately sixty police officers, some dogs, and a
helicopter then searched the surrounding woods but were unable to locate
Powers.
[6] Detective Hannon decided to call off the search, but he and Trooper Justin
Bean remained at the house to see if Powers would return. While there, they
spoke by cell phone to Powers’ brother, who told them: “Donald’s not going to
give up . . . he’s got a gun . . . you guys are probably gonna shoot him.” (Id. 52-
53.) During that phone call, police heard a faint knock at a door on the back of
the house, so they exited from a door on the side of the house to investigate.
Detective Hannon went out first, armed with a taser, and Trooper Bean
followed with a gun to provide cover for Detective Hannon. Trooper Bean
testified, “I knew that he had made the decision to go less than lethal and uh,
that I made the decision to, to be his cover and to make sure that nothing
4
Detective Hannon testified a ghillie suit is clothing typically worn by hunters and military snipers, and it is
designed to help the wearer blend into his surroundings so that he cannot be seen.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 16A05-1612-CR-2855 | August 7, 2017 Page 4 of 13
happened to either him or me.” (Id. at 56.) As Detective Hannon rounded the
corner of the house, he issued commands to Powers and then deployed his
taser. Trooper Bean followed around the corner and saw the taser “was
ineffective, I saw [Powers] start coming back up and that’s when I saw the
barrel of [Powers’] shot gun and another hand coming up . . . and that’s when I
was given my commands and I started . . . firing.” (Id. at 55.) After Trooper
Bean fired a couple of rounds, Powers’ “shot gun went off,” (id. at 56), and it
“looked like a torch coming out of the end of that . . . shot gun, a big fireball
coming toward you.” (Id. at 56-57.) Neither Detective Hannon nor Trooper
Bean was injured during the gunfight, but Powers’ spinal cord was severed,
leaving him paralyzed in all but his neck and one arm. For firing his gunshot
during the confrontation with the two Troopers, the State charged Powers with
one count of Level 1 felony attempted murder. 5
[7] Nearly eighteen months after the shooting, Powers and the State entered a
conditional guilty plea agreement. The State agreed to amend the charges from
Level 2 felony burglary to Level 3 felony burglary, and from Level 1 felony
attempted murder to Level 3 felony attempted aggravated battery. In exchange,
Powers agreed to receive consecutive sentences that were between nine and
fifteen years each. The trial court accepted that agreement.
5
Ind. Code §§ 35-41-5-1 (attempt) (2014) & 35-42-1-1(1) (murder) (2014).
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 16A05-1612-CR-2855 | August 7, 2017 Page 5 of 13
[8] After hearing evidence, the court entered two fifteen-year sentences to be served
consecutively for an aggregate sentence of thirty years with six months of the
burglary sentence suspended to probation. In support thereof, the court found
three aggravators: Powers’ criminal history, which consisted of fourteen prior
convictions, including felony resisting law enforcement; (2) Powers’ violation of
the no-contact order from Ripley County; and (3) the fact Shannon’s injuries
from the burglary were greater than necessary to prove the elements of the
charged offense. As for mitigators, the trial court accepted only Powers’
remorse as a significant mitigating factor. The court noted Powers’ guilty plea,
but found it was a pragmatic decision and had taken over a year to be entered,
such that the court declined to give it significant weight. The court also refused
to accept as mitigators Powers’ health needs, any hardship on his daughter from
his incarceration, and his alleged probability to respond positively to probation.
Discussion and Decision
[9] Powers contends neither his offenses nor his character warrant thirty years in
prison. Indiana Appellate Rule 7(B) provides we “may revise a sentence
authorized by statute if, after due consideration of the trial court’s decision, [we
find] the sentence is inappropriate in light of the nature of the offense and the
character of the offender.” Our review is deferential to the trial court’s decision,
and our goal is to determine whether the defendant’s sentence is inappropriate,
not whether some other sentence would be more appropriate. Conley v. State,
972 N.E.2d 864, 876 (Ind. 2012), reh’g denied. An appellant has the burden to
persuade us that his sentence is inappropriate. Childress v. State, 848 N.E.2d
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 16A05-1612-CR-2855 | August 7, 2017 Page 6 of 13
1073, 1080 (Ind. 2006). Revision of a sentence under Rule 7(B) requires the
appellant demonstrate his sentence is “inappropriate in light of both the nature
of the offenses and his character.” Williams v. State, 891 N.E.2d 621, 633 (Ind.
Ct. App. 2008) (emphasis in original).
[10] With respect to the nature of the offenses, the advisory sentence is the starting
point for determining the appropriateness of a sentence. Anglemyer v. State, 868
N.E.2d 482, 494 (Ind. 2007), clarified on reh’g 878 N.E.2d 218 (2007). The
sentencing range for a Level 3 felony is three to sixteen years, with the advisory
sentence being nine years. Ind. Code § 35-50-2-5 (2014). Thus, for each of
Powers’ convictions, the court imposed sentences that were toward the top of
the range of possible sentences. When determining the appropriateness of a
deviation from the advisory sentence, we consider whether there is anything
more or less egregious about the offense committed by the defendant that
makes it different from the “typical” offense accounted for by the legislature
when it set the advisory sentence. Rich v. State, 890 N.E.2d 44, 54 (Ind. Ct.
App. 2008), trans. denied.
[11] Level 3 felony aggravated battery occurs when a person “knowingly or
intentionally inflicts injury on a person that creates a substantial risk of death or
causes: (1) serious permanent disfigurement; (2) protracted loss or impairment
of the function of a bodily member or organ; or (3) the loss of a fetus.” Ind.
Code § 35-42-2-1.5 (2014). An “attempt” occurs when “acting with the
culpability required for commission of the crime, the person engages in conduct
that constitutes a substantial step toward commission of the crime.” Ind. Code
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 16A05-1612-CR-2855 | August 7, 2017 Page 7 of 13
§ 35-41-5-1 (2014). Powers’ plea of guilty was based on his firing a 12-gauge
shotgun at not one, but two, police officers who were attempting to serve an
arrest warrant on him. Powers knew about the arrest warrant and about the
officers looking for him, but rather than turn himself in to police, as he had
promised he would do, Powers put on camouflage, armed himself with a
weapon, and hid in the woods. Powers’ claim that he did not mean to fire at
officers does not change the facts his shotgun was loaded and fired as he moved
the barrel in the direction of the officers.
[12] Level 3 felony burglary occurs when a person “breaks and enters the building or
structure of another person, with the intent to commit a felony or theft in it . . .
[and it] results in bodily injury to any person other than a defendant.” Ind.
Code § 35-43-2-1 (2014). When Powers broke into Shannon’s house, he did not
just commit burglary, he also violated a no-contact order that had been court
ordered as a condition of his parole in another felony case. He was armed with
and threatened to harm Shannon with a knife, such that his behavior satisfied
the elements of Level 2 felony burglary. See Ind. Code § 35-43-2-1(3)(A) (crime
is Level 2 felony if “committed while armed with a deadly weapon”). His
conviction required “bodily injury,” but any one of the many injuries Shannon
sustained -- a sprained ankle, bruising around her neck, ribs, and wrists, and
scrapes to her arm and a bloody lip -- would have satisfied the statutory
requirement. Thus, we agree with the trial court that she had more injuries
than required to prove Powers’ burglary.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 16A05-1612-CR-2855 | August 7, 2017 Page 8 of 13
[13] There is nothing about the nature of Powers’ offenses that would suggest a
thirty-year sentence is inappropriate. Nor do we believe the nature of those
offenses is somehow mitigated, as Powers asserts, by the facts that Powers
failed to obtain the treatment he needed for his alleged heroin addiction and is
confined to a wheelchair as a result of his decision to point a shotgun at police
officers. Thus, we turn to Powers’ character.
[14] Our review of an offender’s character begins with a defendant’s criminal
history. Rutherford v. State, 866 N.E.2d 867, 874 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007). The
significance of a defendant’s criminal history depends on the nature, number,
and gravity of the prior offenses in relation to the current offense. Id. Powers
was convicted of Class A misdemeanor theft in 1999; Class A misdemeanor
possession of marijuana and five counts of Class C misdemeanor illegal
possession of alcoholic beverages in 2001; Class B misdemeanor public
intoxication and Class A misdemeanor driving while suspended in 2003; Class
A misdemeanor operating while intoxicated and Class D felony resisting law
enforcement in 2004; Class D felony theft in 2005; and Class B misdemeanor
public intoxication in 2007. Powers committed the instant crimes while on
parole for a Level 5 felony alleged to have been committed against his ten-year-
old daughter, and in violation of a no-contact order entered as a condition of
that parole.
[15] Powers testified he takes full responsibility for the crimes committed in these
cases, and the trial court found his remorse genuine. We have no reason to
doubt the trial court’s finding. However, we agree with the State that Powers’
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 16A05-1612-CR-2855 | August 7, 2017 Page 9 of 13
injuries, while tragic, are not relevant to determining whether a thirty-year
sentence is inappropriate for his character. Further, Powers’ criminal history is
extensive. After due consideration, we conclude that his aggregate thirty-year
sentence is not inappropriate in light of the nature of his offenses and his
character.
Conclusion
[16] For the foregoing reasons, we affirm Powers’ aggregate sentence of thirty years.
[17] Affirmed.
Pyle, J., concurs.
Brown, J., dissents with separate opinion.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 16A05-1612-CR-2855 | August 7, 2017 Page 10 of 13
IN THE
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
Donald C. Powers, Jr., Court of Appeals Case No.
16A05-1612-CR-2855
Appellant-Defendant,
v.
State of Indiana,
Appellee-Plaintiff.
Brown, Judge, dissenting.
[18] I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that Powers’s aggregate
sentence of thirty years is not inappropriate. Powers was sentenced to the
thirty-year maximum provided under the plea agreement with six months
suspended to probation. With respect to the nature of the offense, I recognize
that he fled into the woods when law enforcement arrived to serve an arrest
warrant and ultimately discharged a shotgun. His testimony was that he tried
to shoot himself. Whether or not that’s true, he was shot in the back by an
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 16A05-1612-CR-2855 | August 7, 2017 Page 11 of 13
officer, his spine was severed, he cannot move from just below his armpits
down, and he will be confined to a wheelchair for the rest of his life. Powers
testified that, while in the general population, another inmate helped him by
picking him up, placing him in a shower chair and pushing him into the
shower, and then picking him up and placing him back in his bed. The
presentence investigation report states that he is paralyzed from his chest down
as a result of being shot multiple times and he suffers from pressure sores on his
hip and has stomach issues. His physical ability to reoffend would be quite low
compared with able-bodied individuals and he is facing a life sentence of
confinement to a wheelchair.
[19] As for his character, Powers pled guilty pursuant to a plea agreement. The
record reflects that his criminal history is comprised primarily of class B and
class C misdemeanors, with his last offense occurring in 2007. He took full
responsibility for his crimes, stating his actions were one hundred percent his
fault, apologized to the officers, and stated it was his own fault he was in a
wheelchair. Shannon Powers testified that her first nine years of her marriage
to Powers were the best years of her life, that things changed when he did not
stop using drugs, and that all of his bad actions occurred in the span of about
six months. She agreed to provide the constant medical care he needs. Powers
has visited Centerstone as a guest speaker to inspire individuals to stop using
heroin by seeing him in a wheelchair and hearing his story.
[20] In light of the fact Powers received an aggregate executed sentence six months
shy of the maximum contemplated by his plea agreement, his remorse, and the
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 16A05-1612-CR-2855 | August 7, 2017 Page 12 of 13
fact he was rendered paralyzed from the chest down and confined to a
wheelchair, I would remand for the trial court to resentence Powers to the
advisory sentence of ten years for his conviction for burglary and ten years for
his conviction for attempted aggravated battery and for those sentences to be
served consecutively for an aggregate executed sentence of twenty years with
six months suspended to probation.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 16A05-1612-CR-2855 | August 7, 2017 Page 13 of 13
Donald C. Powers, Jr. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
Combined Opinion