FILED AUG 29 2017 UNITEI) sTATEs I)ISTRICT CoURT Clerk, U.S_ District & Bankruptcy FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Courts for the District of Columbia SHEWANDA R.M. PRICE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 17-1623 (UNA) ) HOUSE OF RUTH, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff files “this Class A Federal Human Rights [Di]plomatic lmmunity Business Enterprise Entrepreneur Buildings Builder Architect Contractor . . . Workman Compensation Lawsuit” in order to collect $ 5 trillion in punitive damages from the House of Ruth. F ederal district courts have jurisdiction in civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States. See 28 U.S.C. § 133 l. In addition, federal district courts have jurisdiction over civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds $75,000, and the suit is between citizens of different states. See 28 U.S.C. § l332(a). The complaint does not articulate a claim arising under the United States Constitution or federal law; therefore, the plaintiff does not raise a federal question. Furthermore, because the plaintiff does not demonstrate that the parties are citizens of different states, the plaintiff also fails to establish diversity jurisdiction The Court will grant plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. An Order is issued separately. DATE; €\ \Q»lZT" K'Zj…/\ § 'S‘R United States District Judge