United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 11, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-40977
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ANTONIO DELGADO-GUERRERO,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:05-CR-36-ALL
--------------------
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Antonio Delgado-Guerrero (Delgado) appeals his guilty-plea
conviction for being an alien found in the United States after
having been deported following an aggravated felony conviction.
He argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of
8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional in light of
Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Because the
Government has not invoked the waiver provisions in the plea
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 05-40977
-2-
agreement, the waivers are not binding on Delgado. See United
States v. Story, 439 F.3d 226, 230-31 (5th Cir. 2006).
Delgado’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by
Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998).
Although Delgado contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly
decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule
Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi, we have repeatedly
rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres
remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268,
276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Delgado
properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of
Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to
preserve it for further review.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.