Suri v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-1342V Filed: March 23, 2017 UNPUBLISHED **************************** SIMRAT SURI, * * Petitioner, * v. * Joint Stipulation on Damages; * Influenza Vaccine; Tendinopathy; SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Administration (“SIRVA”); * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) Respondent. * * **************************** Paul Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner. Mallori Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1 Dorsey, Chief Special Master: On November 6, 2015, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that she suffered tendinopathy caused in fact by the influenza vaccine she received on October 8, 2014. Petition at 1, ¶¶ 2, 16; see also Stipulation, filed Mar. 23, 2017, at ¶¶ 1, 2, 4. Petitioner further alleged that she received the influenza vaccine in the United States, has suffered the residual effects of her injury for more than six months, and has never received compensation for her injury, alleged as vaccine caused. Petition at ¶¶ 2, 12, 17; see also Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5. “Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner’s alleged SIRVA or any other injury and further denies that her current disabilities are a sequela of a vaccine-related injury.” Stipulation at ¶ 6. 1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Nevertheless, on March 23, 2017, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. The undersigned finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein. The parties stipulate that petitioner shall receive a payment of $101,810.75 as follows: 1. A lump sum payment of $97,000.00 in the form of a check payable solely to petitioner; 2. A lump sum payment of $4,810.75, which amount represents reimbursement of a Medicaid lien, in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner and New York State Department of Health P.O. Box 415874 Boston, MA 02241-5874 Stipulation at ¶ 8. Petitioner agrees to endorse this check to the State of New York. Id. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under § 15(a). The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2